It's better to be skeptical than to be hateful (imo) b/c when you try to always be impartial and inclusive to everyone (if not with the added component of being loving,like being more extending in your love to family members you don't like) AND remove the component of spite or even vexation,the lack of ability to include ppl/self-limitation you have of excluding someone is removed,as is being abrupt to judgement and evaluation that is poorly done.

That is b/c aversion (*hostile* aversion-->hatred) is removed^6 making a person have more space,be more open and be more receptive to information. Information in higher quantities, as looking for authentic information that is^1 accurate and precise, which will sooner be come across^2 b/c of the removal of hostile aversion.Now the process of looking for that information is still dependent on the person's individual methodicalness but it all the more possible b/c of an absent aversion to a subject.How a person evaluates something,identifies constituent comprised elements and factors,what "data within" is valid or not^3 and other heuristic practices and techniques still depend on personal discretion.

Oh and don't do the skeptism *out of* anger.That^4'll comprise the integrity of learning activity/activities/action for a "clouded gauging instrument"^8 that will have less^9 disclosure of information picked up by it

as it's probing and might make it sooner be/prone to be utter/total dismissing disbelief instead.

as it is probing and might make it sooner be/prone to be utter/total dismissing disbelief instead.

oh, in both cases though,less sensitivity^10


From such doubt as made within/by skepticism you don't take for granted or with full acceptance^11 what might be present without ^5 transforming information into knowledge along the way.^7

In ppl with forensic oriented mindsets (ex.police officers) what is called skepticism is/can be called "suspicion" at times.

Careful now everyone.Being skeptical in certain ways can keep or even maintain ignorance and incompletion .

Times like these when I say or write things so unambigiuosly^12 is like the closest I get to "self-confidence" and having confidence in what I say.

In natural sciences you always are looking for "cause making" (causal..causality,causation) reasons and stuff for why things are and have come to be. In social scis and humanities that can't always be done and what's left to do/look at is structural.Mere structural.Mere structure.Mere structure (to gaze at ).

Doesn't that/does that mean you get full totality undivided,left at you foot though ? .

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.. .--> V or..a connective word implicating disconjunction for representing connections,alternatives,a different rephrasing and not unlike how I've come to use the "slash"/ symbol..how come I use it so often?

^1 "textured by" accuracy and precision..I feel tempted to go speak in a bt more literary a way but I won't b/c I'm trying to be in a more informative light

^2 or alternatively easier to find/taking less effort to find..

^3 whether it's good or bad

^4 Antagonistic or possibly even adversarial mindset/attitude

^5 At least intending ( ? )

^6 Or at suspended momentarily

^7 An example?.Being skeptical about reliability of our own senses is what made people like thinkers have different conceptions of perception a long time ago and we know how we've reaped in the consequences of that skepticism in

(x..cultural,moral,anthropological,philosophical,descriptive,normative,religious..literary ?) relativism,(sensory) psychology and even neurosci x) .Not to mention constant construction, deconstruction and (sometimes) reconstruction of concepts in science,individual's lifestyles,culture,healthcare, religions,philosophies,treatment of others (ex.discrimination and rights) technologies and societal group behavior.

Though politics and economics are bit less corrigible (it seems) at times to this

^8 I mean the mind

^9 guaranteedly consistent/optimal/optimally consistent

^10 b/c heuristics...procedures (for/that)..stimulating/stimulate(d) interest and investigation/looking into..introspection being one such example

^11 or complacently or complaisantly

^12 Or as close as I can to "unambiguity" as a guy always altering with disconjunctions can be

/////////////////////////////
hours ago thinking..something retaliatory..attitude..feedback b/c of that..uh `_`
//////////////////////////
Seeing this trailer for (a documentary?) "Teenage" (http://www.anyclip.com/movies/teenage-2014/teenage-trailer/),those last words on screen "rebellion never gets old" and the last statement "Those who get the youth get the future"

makes me think of how my race and ethnic dynamics teacher said that "all we ever do in this society [Canadian] is rebel" which I can see is not always good^14 ..and yet rebellion seems integral and a reason for the different tensions,conflicts and alliances both ideological and social throughout the history of Western society .Add in what I was just saying about skepticism and well.. ..interesting (link).

And I feel like saying that in Eastern society,skepticism (in the validity and reliability of your own perception:neurological,sensory or not) is a contributing factor to the emerging of all the stuff about perception in Eastern spirituality,philosophy and religion...even "embodied knowledge"^13 and something to consider when thinking about when looking at esoteric stuff and the worldview that common stuff has many paradoxes open to question

Have some skepticism first and then rebel or do ya want it the other way around ?.

I think I'd be a bit to hasty in saying that rebellion might reach it summit form in anarchism but I know so little about anarchy that it might not always means any more than it always means "no laws whatsoever".

..rebellion-->deconstruction.. ..which might not ever stop to see the stuff (including the unfavorable to/harmful to others) it's been doing..`_` does that mean it's possible *never* to reach reconstruction b/c of that ?

(examples of "forever rebelling"..die-hard followers to/of leftist politics and hippies..examples of rebellion that don't get cool with time ..haha ,old people!)

..when you get so caught up in desconstruction for a long time though..that same deconstuction *is a*--> construction to others..that

(i)has to be "deconstructed" itself ..those this mean doing this ad infinitum ?

or

(ii) with study at the stuff from the past ever so disregarded AND by carefully looking at the present path of deconstruction you can make something reconstructive...not without disagreement from your/the deconstructing forerunners ,though?..

^13 Think about all the wild stuff martial artists and ppl who do ascetic practioners can inexplicably do..sustain/endure otherwise fatal strikes,extreme flexibility and contortion,breath in there whole torse,have great reflexes etc..this can even apply some aspects of Eastern medicine like Indian Ayurveda,the *diagnostic* methods in traditional Chinese medicine,acupuncture and the reasons given for massaging techniques

^14 That's the thing about the Eurocentric/Western mileu of individualism..it can do affirming/espousement of individuality/individualism (and rebellion) to the point that it's destructive to life..(both to) itself and others.When you try to negate it,it can be so caught up in its (own) "sphere-rolling" that it complains your stifling it when you do.

The stuff I've said on perception can SO apply to being/the quality of being fearless .