What is the scientific method.
The scientific method is where you observe something interesting in the natural world or with technology then try to come up with a theory as to why such is so then test if your theory is wrong or right if right this theory sit until mostly disproven. At face value this sounds like the perfect way to seek true and hence do science and this theory.

The binary theory method and why this is a better approach.
The binary theory method is where you spot something interesting In the natural world or with technology and try to find two theories as to why this might be then you divise a test to rule out one or the other theory. Now this sounds almost counter intuitive to modern science but it is a better approach in terms of accuracy.
The reason this is a better method is because by assuming there is absolute solutions to obsevations lead to such theory later being out done by better understading a 100 years later such theory which will the be followed softly militantly and religiously until 100 years after that. So it would seem from constant generations of r&d and better theory that there is no ultimate understanding. The approach one needs is one where you end up a range of best guesses for each point of the guess set as opposed to simply a set of more popously certain guesses claiming the ultimate answer to each observation in science.
The reason it's more advanced this way round is because having a more dynamic range of understanding covering each problem leads to more advance overall analysis and more useful scientific ability.

In science the binarary method has had to be used due to competing camps of thought like with the static universe model vs an expanding one and relativity vs quantum mechanics. Although it is inconvineient to not be able to fully adapt relativity to quantum mechanics with regards to the principle of the scientific method it is infact exptremly usful being able to work with both as opposed to simply one or the other. If science used the binary method more as the standard you may get more of the multiplicity of analysis options and such would be incovenient to the more religious aspects of science and pompus pride but it would improve the dynamic range of scientific ability.
I suspect monotheism is less useful than plural theism where finding optimal truth is concerned.

Another problem with the scientific method is if a thought isn't well understood it is obscured and denied more of a research place in the old boys network sometimes even leading to philosophical minds been classed as loonies who should be forced oppressive drugs this again is the wrong approach and if science was better founded with more plural dynamic understanding would probably be less so the case .