Our partner

Thoughts from transgressing dimension
Here you can see some of my wild thoughts and you may find some good worldly ideas on here. I just love thinking and thought I should let my thinking be read.
User avatar
highdimensionman
Consumer 2
Consumer 2
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (1012)
Archives
- November 2022
+ September 2022
+ August 2022
+ July 2022
+ June 2022
+ May 2022
+ April 2022
+ March 2022
+ February 2022
+ January 2022
+ December 2021
+ November 2021
+ October 2021
+ September 2021
+ August 2021
+ July 2021
+ June 2021
+ May 2021
+ April 2021
+ January 2021
+ December 2020
+ November 2020
+ October 2020
+ September 2020
+ August 2020
+ July 2020
+ June 2020
+ May 2020
+ April 2020
+ February 2020
+ November 2019
+ October 2019
+ September 2019
+ May 2018
+ April 2018
+ March 2018
+ February 2018
+ December 2017
+ August 2017
+ May 2017
+ April 2017
+ March 2017
+ February 2017
+ December 2016
+ November 2016
+ October 2016
+ September 2015
+ August 2015
+ April 2015
+ March 2015
+ February 2015
+ January 2015
+ December 2014
+ November 2014
+ September 2014
+ August 2014
Search Blogs

How efficient could CP UASM make a human technical programmer.

Permanent Linkby highdimensionman on Sat Apr 23, 2022 8:56 pm

Well Google chrome contains 250MB worth of technical coding and expands somewhere nearer 1 GB at 0.07 bytes a second per technician.
That same coding requirement written in CP UASM using talk based notation tagging and touch screen symbolic masking would take 80MB effort of technical code and would be coded at first closer to 0.04Bytes/s but top coders could reach about 0.09Bytes/s not to long after and after a longer while closer to 0.17.
This would mean a 1000 top coders could easily port google chrome code and make an alternative browser in 3 months and make it compile to a smaller size and operate more efficiently by 10 years from now today that's more like 20,000+ coders over a year could make a decent browser that was starting to get closer to chrome efficiency.
CP UASM at 0.17Bytes a second that is equivalent to 0.5 Bytes/s in C which any human would very much struggle to maintain beyond slight spurts of coding.
Also in many cases CP UASM could be faster than C versions.
If you can properly match code development AI to human interfacing This could be closer to 1.2 Bytes a second of equivalent C coding.
If a top coder coded 5 days a week for 8 hours for 12 weeks at 1.2Bytes/s of equivalent c code then could have made a new very lite OS like windows 3.1 level from scratch about 2MB of coding and compiled to about 7MB + media content. they could have also made a basic 3d game like quake but with more polygons and better lighting although they could do more now with unreal 5.
So when It all goes software 2.0 man will get this kind of performance boost allowing for more advanced technical work and bigger personal more technically demanding software projects to be done although man will take time to adapt and does have limits.
This could well lead to over 6PB 20PB compiled of highly technical c level and lower coding. Imagine 14 PBytes + data and media of efficient binary sized and high performance linux software for example produced in one year this would be immense and the software choice would be pronominal the linux community would be developing their software interests a lot faster right near the threshold of the speed of imagination zero point you could say.

Diagnosis - Paranoid Schizophrenia although challenged.
Medication - Clopixol injection 4 weekly.
Personal diagnosis - I battle with the chemistry and biological effects of Clopixol every day trying to improve on the heath and range of my approach.
I try to improve my thinking. Hopefully some good ideas shine through.
0 Comments Viewed 4340 times

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Majestic-12 [Bot]