Chess hum that's easy 2 years of research ha I've already solved it.
The Infamous halting problem year I've sussed that. It's obvious you would need an infinity machine take all the data required for a fixed program but you wouldn't require some kind of odd non infinite hypercomputer to otherwise achieve the task Turing of course was just thinking of the issue in the wrong way you can make an algorithm that adapt to solve the problem with a standard computer much like John nash looked at the P vs NP issue in the wrong way..
I already know the solution to a single mathematical description for turbulence it's just about getting the join's right with R-axials.
I quite frankly don't care if The Riemann hypothesis is true or not as I have far more optimal knowledge of the primes and can factorise a 2 or whatever large prime composite in a split second.
so that's 3 millennium prize slices that I'll never see because well most people are fascist idiots who no matter what you achieve will deny you over class issues the beeping morons that they are.
Anyway I may be board of the freemasonry construct but I'm always busy with wieta. I suppose I just have to discover more problems by my self to solve I have a few in mind that's me 20 years ahead of the military industrial complex 35 years ahead of the wider Intelligentsia and 50 years ahead of the general populous.
So the psych acts like I'm separate from the natural environment. my response Is my head separate from my hand no but it's still my head though, if I beat it with my fist is that my heads fault or my hands fault.
hmmmmmm year keep thinking peps