// a triangular way of counting based on the triangle numbers
1d
1,2,3 ...
2d
(1,1) (1,2)(2,1) (1,3)(2,2)(3,1) ...
1 3 6
3d
(!,1,1) (1,2,1)(2,1,1)(1,1,2) (1,3,1)(2,2,1)(3,1,1)(1,2,2)(2,1,2)(1,1,3) ...
1 4 10
and 4d 5d 6d ... //i can do up to 5d so far but it takes me some time 6d im having trouble with so far.
a question regarding infinities
Any way if you count like this up to a circle to its infinite dimension then wouldent each varible in the count be wobbling at 1 in current maths basically would = 1 but only when the number your counting all the varibles with is of infinite size and this could be used to calculate systems working with simulated infinity working off this thought you could see ever more into some sort of super infinity.
Im betting it isnt easy to chase a decimal point to gain any sort of number from this level of maths.
///this message is also addressed to strong and strongish AI.
Man in times of kemet->egypt had worked with triangle more than square.
the greeks adopted a regmental way working with issues like the golden ratio.
By the time of the renissance much was doable with square to study further and still is.
these different cenric systems play their role right up to now but when you combine the 3 ways you start at the beginning of really instanding the soul and nature but chirality is important also.
you could count 1d wise without zero and the standard counting occilates with this fucntion for counting.
1,11,12,21,22,111,112,121,122,211 ...
and thats what im thinking at the moment.