While they are my "Therapist" at this time due to a change up in the roster at the place I go to, I won't be seeing a 'psychiatrist' probably until summer. I'm okay with that overall. I did learn some interesting things about my T at this time, and it's kind of an interesting thing, yet it's also a bit disturbing to me, and I don't know why.

T stated that the only time they have seen a case of BPD or DID was when they 'shifted', and she described it as 'creepy'. Honestly, saying something like that, even though me and T do jest a bit with each other, seems a bit extreme. That almost sounds judgmental, and that one would have to be totally crazy in order to have other identities!

There has been a decision that she shall remain to help, however, until otherwise, she is to be taken as only treating other portions, such as anxiety and depression until further notice. They seem like such a nice person too, someone that can be related to, but then I also have to question how someone with ADHD.

Come to think of it, that has to be questioned. It is possible that they could be that they are able to do their job with limited impairment of such, or else why would they be in their position?

The other problem that is noted at this time, is that they want me to go on at least one anti-anxiety medication. This after it was noted that medication is something that would rather be avoided.

T at least stated that they felt 'being smart' wasn't a problem, since it was the sarcastic, but questioning type, always looking for answers.

Oh well. Until next time!

Probably merely a bad choice of words. I have never witnessed a shift but I can see how it might be disconcerting until you get used to seeing it. New things can be unnerving. I had a schizophrenic in my extended family and when he'd have a fit you'd be scared (he was a big guy) unless you grew up around him and so when he'd lose touch it didn't scare me a bit. I was used to it. Just a matter of exposure.

The ADHD is interesting. I'm ADD also and find listening difficult.

Hoping it's a bad choice of words, but for some odd reason, it was very off-putting, and the only time that's been seen around here was through videos and movies. Can't really say that Hollywood is a fully accurate portrayal of the issue though. LOL

Not the word I would have chosen speaking to a client.

That is agreed upon. The question is, shall this be raised to the T. It's kind of worrisome when one feels that they've already gotten a specific thing for you without delving further.

In fact, it's questionable as to whether she is prying for information, or if this is a ruse, or something else. It's hard to discern, but hopefully, there will be more information on to what they are trying to do.

I suppose it's their job to know things, not sure if I'd call it prying.

I'd be inclined to give the benefit of a doubt and treat it as poor word choice, until more proof of a bias.

That sounds like a good idea. Right now she is the only link I got to anything, so it'd probably be best to think that it was just that, instead of making it a big deal, unless somewhere along the lines she does it again.