not when it matters anyway!
So having been recently delighted that we seem to have solved a few issues recently and managing to get out with Sioux who spoke in the park when someone was letting their dogs run to us. Kit was excited to reveal a new self to her youngest sibling when they came.
We went to answer the door with the intention of showing we now could walk without aids and speak quietly and clearly as we have been doing around the house when no-one else is here other than the dog. (We've never used a communication aid with family but have always had a severe stammer as soon as we had to physically try to speak to an actual person) We've also always used crutches in front of family to get in their houses and walk a short distance such as from car park into pub and only used a wheelchair with when it's been a longer distance than a few steps before we could sit down.
Whether it was because we hadn't gone to the door with at least one crutch or the rollator I'm not sure but then the wheelchair was the only thing right next to the door (it's kept behind the front door for when we have to answer it) so literally one second we were walking towards the door with the intention of being stood at the door stood up with no aids to greet our sibling and the next we found ourselves sat in the wheelchair and as usual when trying to explain what we'd wanted (they was coming to do a repair to the scooter) every other word was a real struggle to physically get out. Our voice was louder and seemed out of control (even though we'd also left hearing aids out so our voices could be heard better to us) and littered with stammers on nearly every other word.
When they left we were disappointed and exhausted from the act of physically speaking. ..and confused..as when Kit and Sioux went to the park sunday morning. It was definitely Sioux that spoke in a softer voice. We had never seen those people with their dogs before though..could it be that 'we' the system knew they didn't have an expectation already of how we would speak? We have spoken normally to an old guy with his dog we always seen them when we visit a place several miles from our home so he doesn't know exactly where we live and so it felt safe. we were also standing up playing ball with our dog when he saw us, (with a walking stick) but many people who use mobility scooter's can walk some compared with people maybe not expecting someone who was in an a manual or electric wheelchair to just get up and start walking about.
of course as soon as our sibling left, Kit was able to come out fully and we got out of the chair walking round the house and talking to the dog without stammering at all, but Kit always thought she was controlling the switch and that she was being herself more with that person who of course had known her since childhood. They knows she's autistic she doesn't have to hide that fact, there isn't the pressure to pretend to be so normal when it's just us, but Kit doesn't understand why she couldn't show she could walk a little better just a few steps in the hall. The switch happened without her consent and I guess she always believed she was controlling when she used her alters, as she could always switch back as soon as people had left and we were alone again.
Can anyone explain what the biological reason is that people with DID can't usually control when they switch and who to? ..to help us understand this as we thought we'd cracked it! Is it a 'defense mechanism' by the system? Could there be another 'alter' whose controlling things who maybe decided this wasn't a good idea of Kit's to reveal that at that time? (who other alters aren't aware of).