*trigger warning for mentions of drug use*
Hi all,
as part of my ongoing quest to understand my brain, I wanted to share some thoughts and see if anyone relates. I have just posted in this thread
dissociative-identity/topic116168.html
some of my current thoughts on DID. So here is the rest of the thesis:
If we look at our selves (singular or plural) as semantic structures rather than fixed objects, it follows that DID is something a brain does when it is unable to represent the totality of a person's experience in one coherent self-model.
('Semantic structure' here means that what we experience as a self is really a model that the brain produces (similar to a computer program) in order to provide a reference point from which to relate different experiences. Our self-model, or subjectivity, is the point of reference from which all other bits of content in the brain (memory, experience) are related to each other into a coherent model of the world. Kind of like an algorhythm that tells a computer how to relate different bits of code to run a program. If the brain cannot do this, because experience is so contradictory that it cannot be integrated, the brain kind of gives up and says, ok then, I'll just produce two (or more) self-models based on two (or more ) versions of reality).
Now we know that much of 'mental illness' is to some degree related to the brain's ability to produce coherent semantic representations of reality going awry. In schizophrenia, for example, the brain's ability to produce and reproduce language is compromised - the semantic representation of reality breaks down and disintegrates and thus the person cannot accurately represent the outside world or their inner experience in relation to it ("language" here not just in the literal sense but in the sense that all thought is organised in linguistic structures - no language, no abstract thought).
so the difference between DID and schizophrenia could be that in DID, the brain produces strong and coherent semantic models (alters) that correspond to different appreciations of the outside world. In schizophrenia, on the other hand, the semantic coherence breaks down altogether.
the interesting thing is, schizophrenia, according to some researchers, is characterised by an excess of dopamine in the brain. Certain drugs that massively boost dopamine in the brain (such as cocaine) can temporarily induce schizophrenia-like symptoms in healthy subjects, such as semantic disintegration, paranoia and delusions.
I'm not sure about the dopamine factor in DID, but I know that I, personally, am frequently low on dopamine. Now here's the thing: I have also noticed that once I increase my dopamine levels (through drugs or supplements), my mental fragmentation (i.e. separateness from alters) becomes less.
So this leads me to think: what if there is some kind of continuum, the extreme points of which are DID and schizophrenia, that is mediated by dopamine? so:
low dopamine - rigid semantic structures that can appear difficult to dissolve (e.g. amnestic walls between alters, difficulty integrating different structures/alters)
high dopamine - fluid and 'soft' semantic structure with a tendency to completely disintegrate.
If there's anything to this then it may be possible to shift up and down the continuum by manipulating dopamine levels - i.e. where schizophrenia patients are usually treated with medication that lowers dopamine, DID could repsond to treatments that up dopamine, thus make the semantic structures that we experience as alters more permeable and facilitate integration.
*edit*