*stop reading here*
So, don't ask me how, but I recently stumbled across this
[[Mod edit - inappropriate link due to graphic content]]
Which leads one to investigate here
[[mod edit - commercial website ]]
[[[Mod: from the article -
Chloe Cross wrote:Trottla is a Japanese company that produces and sells child-sized, life-like dolls. They’re made to feel and look like real children and come with heating instructions and moveable joints. Before you berate me for immediately assuming these dolls are for paedophiles; there is no male counterpart...
The company clearly states that the dolls are not to be used for sexual purposes, but if they're just kids' toys, why the hell would you dress them up in matching white lace lingerie sets and give them teeny weeny awkward nipples? The photo galleries used to promote the dolls on the manufacturer's website are also enough to creep out even the hardiest internet veteran.
Generally, it is legal to produce, sell and buy these dolls in the UK, though obviously the lines begin to blur when it comes to their usage and how they’re displayed. How is there a loophole in UK law big enough for a life-size child sex doll to fit through? I caught up with Shin Takagi, the owner of Trottla and the guy who makes the dolls, to find out how his business continues to operate.
PM the op if you wish to see the link.]]]
And the opinions expressed in the prior are suggestive of use in sexual ways, despite the fact that the manufacturer specifies that they aren't designed with that capability. And some of the opinions expressed by people at the bottom of the page are interesting and I thought it deserved a rational conversation. Do you think these dolls, if modified either at manufacture or afterwards, would appease the need of paedophiles without exaccerbating it and making them want to 'upgrade' to something a little more living. As, on a personal level, the galleries they have of their dolls, some a little more risky than others, did exactly the same for me as picures of real people in similar states of dress and so, in my opinion, I do believe that with how good the dolls are that it'd be enough to satisfy what is currently unsatisfiable without *serious* negative repurcussions, on multiple levels. Which I again hasten to add, I do *not* in any way condone and do not think anyone should do with a real, living child.
Discuss.