Why I practice (legal) pedophilia, a partial explaination

For the average guy it's near impossible to have a very good-looking girl, who looks anything like many little girls do (practically like a super model), give them the time of day. Let alone some affection. I have tried every which way. It's just banging your head against a wall. You get ignored, or at best they will humor you a bit and "politely" move on. If you don't have the right genes, or a lot of resources, you don't get the female. Just like in the animal world. We are just advanced animals, after all.

Attractive adult girls, the much fewer of them that exist, have learned to no longer be accepting unless you are a big macho jock, probably with a lot of money, and maybe abusive. If you're not that guy, little girls may be your only way to attention from a very attractive girl. I hope you won't try to deny the truth in that. Not in EVERY case. But it's generally true.

Little girls face, legs, butts, tummies, often look fantastic. And much of the time much more developed than they get credit for. Even at 8, for one example, a lot of girls already have a pretty big plump girly butt. Their faces can already have a longer nose, and mostly adult structure. And their legs look almost the same but smaller proportioned. Yeah, that same with won't love me at 18 like she does at 8. But she's actually pretty attractive already if you just open your eyes, and see what society says you shouldn't.

There is no way I'm going to stop feeling this way about little girls. I honestly feel like it's something like a religious dogma that we must deny their attractiveness, even though they blatantly have much of the looks of women, but just extra small and cute.

Many of us guys simple can't get such attractive females otherwise. Call us losers. But it's mostly a matter of genes. I wasn't born with the right ones, therefore I have no right to expect any attention from attractive females at all in life? Other guys who won the genetic lottery just get a monopoly on them? Forget that. I want at least a little fun in my one life.

I am staying legal. But I think it's fair that I get some love from the beauties before they all get taken up by jerks with good genes. Pedophilia gets you a bit of time with the more attractive females, before they all go to guys many of us can't compete with.

Tell me that doesn't make sense? I know it does.

Just be myself? I'll find an attractive girl? Nope, that's not reality. If I want an attractive girl, I've got to pay a lot of money I don't have for a cold, very used, money grubber one to pretend to like me for a short time. Or I can have a little beauty, who looks at least as good to my eyes, as what society says I should like give me some high quality attention and affection, even if no sex. The second option fits my emotional needs (and finances) much better. That's why I practice (legal) pedophilia.

You've got it all wrong. Most of the attractive women I know go for the more intelligent, mature men. Doesn't have too much to do with genes. I've seen a lot of unattractive guys going out with very attractive women.

Yeah, when I write this, I do expect someone to come along and say I have it all wrong. All my years of experience of these issues, and I still have no insight. I would love to hear from someone that agrees with me.

UnluckyPaladin wrote:Yeah, when I write this, I do expect someone to come along and say I have it all wrong. All my years of experience of these issues, and I still have no insight. I would love to hear from someone that agrees with me.

You're taking the blame off yourself. Maybe you're just not good with talking to women.

It doesn't make sense to me. It sounds like you are trying to justify your sexual attraction to children. I don't think you need to justify it. If you are attracted to girls, then you are attracted to girls.

I could argue that the reason I find brunettes attractive is because I can't get a hot blonde and all the available blondes are ugly. Or I could just admit that I'm attracted to brunettes.

You describe both girls and women in terms of their body parts and what they have to offer you. Any woman who has a healthy sense of identity and self-esteem may avoid you because of your attitude. If you only want to objectify a woman and have sex, you can hire a prostitute. If you want a more meaningful relationship with a woman, you may need to think beyond sex and think about what you have to offer as a partner. Yes, there is an attraction to money and muscles, but many women want a partner who is kind and supportive - not a man who's just sizing up their butt and feeling sorry for himself because hot women don't fall into his lap.

If you are an exclusive paedophile and don't want a relationship with a woman, you don't need to justify that by painting all women as ugly or shallow. I like men but I don't want a relationship with one, not because men aren't good enough, but because it's not what I want for me right now.

I'm going to be honest with you. Tough love, sugar. I feel like a lot of you guys on here have serious confidence issues. Idk how attractive any of you are, so I can't say anything regarding that. But I think you seem to dislike women because apparently we all like the same kind of guy (hint: we don't), and we would never give you a chance. I'm not saying you're a bunch of fedoras with neckbeards aka Nice Guys...but I think you don't understand that women respond best to confidence. Personally I think a lot of you find women intimidating. Granted, we like guys that are physically attractive...but we aren't expecting you to be Channing Tatum.

The women I am friends with like:
Approachability
Confidence
Intelligence
A Sense of Humor

And I ALSO find it incredibly annoying that a lot of guys (not necessarily here but on the internet in general), seem to have this crazy sense of entitlement to women who live up to a beauty standard that they themselves do not live up to. I'm sorry that you guys are fed false hopes and dreams by Hollywood that an average looking guy simply DESERVES the supermodel because that's the way his story is supposed to play out.

With this post you are talking about not getting the supermodel...but then you refer to not having the genes and the resources to get the female. I think you aren't quite understanding what's happening to you. You are apparently chasing girls that are out of your league and refusing the Average Gal who is more on your level. That's NO ONE's fault but your own.

pinkerbelle: I can't agree totally. But your post was at least more realistic on this issue than many I have seen. You didn't do the usual "we women are just looking for a sweet guy!" thing. Thanks for that.

Confidence might really help me. But it's a chicken and egg thing. You can't succeed without confidence. But you can't get confidence without success. It doesn't come out of nowhere.

I really feel like women may hate guys that aren't up to their dating standards. Do you feel anything like that?

-- Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:25 am --

Pinkerbelle:
"And I ALSO find it incredibly annoying that a lot of guys (not necessarily here but on the internet in general), seem to have this crazy sense of entitlement to women who live up to a beauty standard that they themselves do not live up to. I'm sorry that you guys are fed false hopes and dreams by Hollywood that an average looking guy simply DESERVES the supermodel because that's the way his story is supposed to play out. "

Similar things are often said about women expecting a Prince Charming to come and sweep them off their feet, like in the Disney Movies they grew up watching constantly.

I don't really have a big thing for supermodels. I prefer very natural looks. A lot of little girls remind me of supermodels with some of their often impressive physical features, though. Perfect skin. Often perfect teeth. Very slim with beautiful legs and long flowing hair. Many little girls look much like little super models to me.

What I meant was that with little girls, even an average or below average guy can get the attention of a girl that is actually pretty impressive looking, in my opinion, via pedophilia. A much better looking girl than that guy could probably get if he stuck with adults.

Yes, it's sort of like the mail order bride thing, what I have said here. With that the more loserish guys can get a lot better looking girl than they might be able to otherwise. The same is actually true of pedophilia. I haven't really seen that said before. And it's true. So I said it.

Just look at my Temptation by a 6 year old blond story for an example. I had a girl that looks like a little super model all over me. An 18 year old twin of that girl wouldn't give me the time of day.

UnluckyPaladin wrote:pinkerbelle: I can't agree totally. But your post was at least more realistic on this issue than many I have seen. You didn't do the usual "we women are just looking for a sweet guy!" thing. Thanks for that.

Confidence might really help me. But it's a chicken and egg thing. You can't succeed without confidence. But you can't get confidence without success. It doesn't come out of nowhere.

I really feel like women may hate guys that aren't up to their dating standards. Do you feel anything like that?

-- Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:25 am --

Pinkerbelle:
"And I ALSO find it incredibly annoying that a lot of guys (not necessarily here but on the internet in general), seem to have this crazy sense of entitlement to women who live up to a beauty standard that they themselves do not live up to. I'm sorry that you guys are fed false hopes and dreams by Hollywood that an average looking guy simply DESERVES the supermodel because that's the way his story is supposed to play out. "

Similar things are often said about women expecting a Prince Charming to come and sweep them off their feet, like in the Disney Movies they grew up watching constantly.

Define dating standards? I don't really know what you mean by that. Do you mean experience or my aesthetic standard?

I don't actually know much about that. The guys I find most attractive even since high school are much older and therefore generally pretty experienced. My general range of guys I date is 27-45. I just feel like I can learn more from older guys. They seem to have a better sense of self and generally the sex is better. Just more put together overall, I guess. It's a better dynamic. They tend to be more CONFIDENT.

But when I've been with a guy closer to my age I've been a "first" and I make it a POINT to bolster their confidence because I don't think there's anything sadder than a man who won't OWN his manhood. I don't hate guys who don't know what they're doing. I don't mind teaching. I open their minds to different ways to do things. I teach them how to treat a girl. I let them know that there is no shame to exploring one's own sexuality. One of my first questions is always "What is YOUR biggest fantasy? Okay let's try that." or "Okay let me show you." Because I feel like a lot of guys don't know how to bring that sort of thing up without prompting. My current guy is just a bit older than me...but he knows he can ask me anything and I'm willing to try or discuss anything with him. He lacks confidence, but he know if he wasn't what I wanted, I wouldn't stick around.

One thing I simply CANNOT abide is clinginess. And less experienced guys tend to be more clingy.

As far as your statement about women expecting Prince Charming. Yes, that's equally as annoying. In my experience with women it's like they expect to be rescued by some gorgeous romantic who will love them forever and ever. That's ALSO unrealistic.

Truthfully, unless you have something else going for you....if you're a 7, you can expect to pull a 6,7, or 8. Maybe an insecure 8.5 or iffy 9. People seriously need to be more realistic about their freaking options.

UnluckyPaladin wrote:What I meant was that with little girls, even an average or below average guy can get the attention of a girl that is actually pretty impressive looking, in my opinion, via pedophilia. A much better looking girl than that guy could probably get if he stuck with adults.

But this is a result of your paedophilia, not a justification for it. A person who is not attracted to girls will not see it the same way as you. Their own sexual attractions will shape who they find the most attractive.

Let's say I'm very ugly and I'm sexually attracted to dogs. I may have little chance to date supermodels and beauty-pageant-winning humans, but I may still have a good chance at spending time with prize-winning dogs. I could argue that it's therefore only reasonable to be sexually attracted to dogs because the offerings and my prospects are better. But it would not be an objective fact that the dogs are more attractive than the humans available to me. Other people may say that the dogs are far less attractive than ordinary looking humans because they are not zoophiles.