Why I practice (legal) pedophilia, a partial explaination

Platypus wrote:

UnluckyPaladin wrote:What I meant was that with little girls, even an average or below average guy can get the attention of a girl that is actually pretty impressive looking, in my opinion, via pedophilia. A much better looking girl than that guy could probably get if he stuck with adults.

But this is a result of your paedophilia, not a justification for it. A person who is not attracted to girls will not see it the same way as you. Their own sexual attractions will shape who they find the most attractive.

Let's say I'm very ugly and I'm sexually attracted to dogs. I may have little chance to date supermodels and beauty-pageant-winning humans, but I may still have a good chance at spending time with prize-winning dogs. I could argue that it's therefore only reasonable to be sexually attracted to dogs because the offerings and my prospects are better. But it would not be an objective fact that the dogs are more attractive than the humans available to me. Other people may say that the dogs are far less attractive than ordinary looking humans because they are not zoophiles.

That's a very funny comparison. It made me laugh. No, the prize-winning dogs would not do it for me, no matter how good-looking they are, because I'm not a zoophile. I see what you are saying. My whole thing here wouldn't work for a guy unless he already has pedophilic tendencies like me. But if you do have those tendencies, and I think a fair fraction of guys probably do if they gave it a short, it can be a very good deal in some ways.

UnluckyPaladin wrote:I see what you are saying. My whole thing here wouldn't work for a guy unless he already has pedophilic tendencies like me.

Cool, I'm glad it made sense and you weren't offended by it.

ReVamp wrote:Most of the attractive women I know go for the more intelligent, mature men.

ha.

almost forgot to laugh.

This post could read two different ways. Either you are so shallow and entitled that you'd rather look to little girls that are easier to manipulate just to avoid being with someone you consider ugly or you are really reaching for excuses to justify your attraction to children. yeah, kids aren't going to judge you for what you look like but why do you not hold yourself to the same standard? You said you want affection and love yet you focus on what women look like? you will never know who can make you actually happy if you go around only taking looks into account.

JJessx92 wrote:This post could read two different ways. Either you are so shallow and entitled that you'd rather look to little girls that are easier to manipulate just to avoid being with someone you consider ugly or you are really reaching for excuses to justify your attraction to children. yeah, kids aren't going to judge you for what you look like but why do you not hold yourself to the same standard? You said you want affection and love yet you focus on what women look like? you will never know who can make you actually happy if you go around only taking looks into account.

Attraction is part of a relationship. I can't even attract a woman I have decent chemistry wiith. Little girls at least are appealing, unlike the women I can get. I'm not being shallow, just practical.

UnluckyPaladin, maybe you are describing some elements of contemporary sociology? Firstly, if you live in American or UK or some place like that, there's a big problem with obesity; obesity is not usually considered attractive by many men, and with obesity rates running above 60% in the English-speaking parts of the world, that reduces the pool of attractive women by over half. Secondly, there's also a big issue with egoic consciousness in the USA and UK and so on, the result is a lot of mental illness in the form of workaholism, status fixation, and accumulation fetish: obviously not very attractive qualities in a potential mate. Thirdly, one of the ironic results of feminism is that while women have improved their social standing significantly, many women continue to seek partners who they perceive as their superiors: richer, taller, and better social connections: the result of this persistent "marrying up" phenomena in a woman's world is that heaps of desirable and successful women can't find any man who is their better and so they remain single: in the article I've linked below it's estimated that two-thirds of "A-class women" remain single. What these contemporary sociological facts add up to is an environment where many men are not able to find a partner.

http://travel.cnn.com/shanghai/life/sha ... ack-085575

Its all about the money and power. If u have cash and a status position that gives u power then u get to bang the prime choice yummies... Older women want the young studs for their bodies. Younger women want older men for their security. Plain and simple...

rainbowstar wrote:UnluckyPaladin, maybe you are describing some elements of contemporary sociology? Firstly, if you live in American or UK or some place like that, there's a big problem with obesity; obesity is not usually considered attractive by many men, and with obesity rates running above 60% in the English-speaking parts of the world, that reduces the pool of attractive women by over half. Secondly, there's also a big issue with egoic consciousness in the USA and UK and so on, the result is a lot of mental illness in the form of workaholism, status fixation, and accumulation fetish: obviously not very attractive qualities in a potential mate. Thirdly, one of the ironic results of feminism is that while women have improved their social standing significantly, many women continue to seek partners who they perceive as their superiors: richer, taller, and better social connections: the result of this persistent "marrying up" phenomena in a woman's world is that heaps of desirable and successful women can't find any man who is their better and so they remain single: in the article I've linked below it's estimated that two-thirds of "A-class women" remain single. What these contemporary sociological facts add up to is an environment where many men are not able to find a partner.

http://travel.cnn.com/shanghai/life/sha ... ack-085575

I think you and me are really talking about the same problem here. Your post may be a better explanation than mine, really. Of course women will deny it. People with an advantage always says it's just hard work. It's human nature. But the demand level difference between the genders, despite similar numbers, is a total sick joke (more on that below). And there has to be a reason behind it. Again, your post may be even closer to the full truth.

Even if pedophilia isn't really much of a solution for most men in this position. It does act as a bit of a crutch for me. Even though I do find little girls appealing, anyway.

Since women are nearly equal to men now, they need to be more open to men that are their equals instead of thinking they need to go up. I think this is a real phenomen, and leaves a lot of men in the dust.

For a bit of proof, just try setting up a couple of fake dating profiles for an experiment. A reasonably attractive male one and similar female one. Don't put any text that would appeal much to anyone, so that you know the results are all about the genders of the profiles. I've actually done this. I have actually done some homework on this issue. I'm not talking out of my ass.

Here is about what happens:

The male one will be mostly a ghost town will tumble weeds blowing through. While the female one will get a huge storm of interest. It will have hundreds of messages within days. And probably already have filled up the message limit of the site in well under a week. The only difference is the gender. Women are HUGELY, HUGELY more in demand. A ton of men just arent getting a mate. And I think it has at least something to do with your post.

Men will mostly take someone just to have a girlfriend. While women mostly won't. If they can't have the higher status man. And they CAN'T ALL. Then they just stay out of the dating market. Therefore the massive disparity in demand level for women versus men. It's certainly there. Try the experiment yourself and see. And I think this may be part of the puzzle.

meh. I think most guys just aren't willing to put forth the effort. Women aren't obligated to just accept you. I've turned down plenty of guys that were either gorgeous, well off, of both for having crap personalities or being intellectually beneath me. Who cares if you are hot? What will we talk about?? That said...if a guy is short, fat, and balding he admittedly is stuck in the friendzone perhaps with benefits out of pity.

xoPinkerbelleox wrote:meh. I think most guys just aren't willing to put forth the effort. Women aren't obligated to just accept you. I've turned down plenty of guys that were either gorgeous, well off, of both for having crap personalities or being intellectually beneath me. Who cares if you are hot? What will we talk about?? That said...if a guy is short, fat, and balding he admittedly is stuck in the friendzone perhaps with benefits out of pity.

He's kind of a hypocrit. He's talking about average guys not being able to get very attractive women. What about average women? I'm not the best looking guy, but I've dated women who could easily be considered out of my league.