Hi TK,
I hope you are still active on this forum; there are so many new faces here

and so many of what I would call the 'great libraries' have left.
As you correctly pointed out, it's hard for all people to articulate intimacy. I realized how true that was when I wanted to reply to your post, so I saw a great opportunity for introspection and growth
I have now given this a lot of thought, instead of just posting the first reply that comes to mind (that would have been unnecessarily defensive).
Why did I love her? I loved who she pretended to be. I loved the character I saw, the integrity, the person maintaining a sense of honour in spite of the fact that it's hard. You see, I believe that every time that you have to make a decision, and you can do something the easy way, or the correct and moral way (often being harder), that which you give up to do it the correct way is the price you pay for your character. I have a deep respect for that, and she player right into that. Ironically, everything I admire is what, in reality and retrospect, she lacks. I suspect she even lacks a true understanding thereof. Additionally, the 'little girl' that needed to be protected. I saw someone who bravely stood for what is right, took a beating for it from life, and needed help. I saw a partner, an ally, a friend. After she started speaking about us being 'soulmates', I started seeing that too. Now the word makes me cringe.
Of the items you listed: Her smile - sure. Her laught - most definitely (I am of a more serious disposition and definitely enjoyed the sense of fun she brought to the table). Her sense of humour - I always thought she tried, but in retrospects she could quote Terry Pratchett, Douglas Adams and Seinfeld, but often didn't get the very same humour. She told jokes that experience showed her other people found funny, I think. Her tits - not in this case. If I have to think about it, they were saggy, but that was not important. I also never slept with her - that is due to my own value system. For whatever amount of flack I may take for it, I honestly, out of choice, believe in what is jokingly referred to as pre-sexual marriage. It's part of my religion and part of my value system. So I would not allow sex - she professed the same value system
Does this mean her looks were not important? I'm not that naive. Of course they were - on some level I am as 'shallow' as any animal. Of course I would prefer her to exactly the same person in a less attractive 'shell'. Maybe this makes me a hypocrite? At least I'm brutally honest. It would certainly have taken her longer to have the same impact on me if she was less attractive, but the face was more important than the body, and the personality and especially perceived character much more so than her face.
I realize my response seemed harsh, and I think it was. Thanks for (implicitly) pointing that out. My answer was initially an attempt to give an honest answer to a question - not to make the attack I seemed to have made. Despite all that, my answer was honest and I still stand by it. She said she liked that I was noble, but I have no doubt she said that because it's a quality she knows I appreciate in others. The rest of it still seems pretty shallow to me, not so much in the content but in what is completely overlooked in comparison.
I do agree trust is important. That's the real kicker here then, isn't it.