ArbreMonde wrote:
It does involve some level of dissociation because in order to mask efficiently, you need to disconnect from your emotions/sensory input. It is discussed, among other things, in: https://did-research.org/comorbid/devel ... -disorders
We found a sentence here
"Pressure to "mask" as neurotypical (i.e., hide autistic traits and pretend to be someone the autistic person is not) may cause identity confusion and, when combined with childhood trauma, encourage the formation of dissociated identities"
the word dissociated identities is underlined and a link which leads to a page about alters in general.
That page says the definition of DID is
"In cases of DID, most if not all alters can take recurrent executive control of the body in which they reside. Alters each have their own perception of self as a unique individual or entity and do not view themselves as only an aspect of a complete person"
In which case Kit is right we are 'more DID than OSDD' ..although sometimes it feels the other way if one alter is out alot and others just communicate with you in the background without taking over.
I think the fact some diagnosis lists say person must be traumatised by it made us unsure that we'd get a diagnosis? I think Kit may have took it to mean you had to be traumatised by being told you were DID or by the knowledge that you had multiple alters???
Maybe it's the autism and our younger alters heavy reliance on fantasy and non-human alters initially but none of the insiders felt traumatised by the news that DID maybe possible??? Most just found it a relief or see it as a gift (the inner world and being able to escape to it and switch out when stuff gets too stressful?
Maybe it's also partly there realisation that its a result of the way our brain processes stuff even things seen as non-traumatic for regular kids? we did find this and have found it mentioned briefly elsewhere.
"Other early and chronic traumatization can cause it, e.g., medical trauma, involving multiple painful and prolonged medical procedures at an early age"
We (I say we..I mean Kit here!..she did all the research) it was the early ..pre-7yr old experience of the intense 'medical intervention combined with the way our brain processes stuff' that triggered it in us at such an early age...and then bullying etc throughout school added to it ... and it was the only way the younger alters knew how to cope with or escape from it, so it became ingrained as a coping mechanism.
I wonder if thats why 'Thea' and 'Maddie' were then completely disconnected from the inner world when the social expectations from us was the highest? (college/work/uni etc ..(late teens to 40's when we became mostly housebound)? ..once alot of expectation disappeared and we got more and more time alone, the insiders started to re-emerge more often.
I would say then 'Maddie' would have potentially being the most distressed by it if she had actually got to a specialist to tell someone about her symptoms, because at one point she seemed worried she was developing dementia (she had written about it in a diary). I think the system didn't know what to do so let Kit came out and take over to start researching, but it caused more and more memory gaps for 'Maddie' because they could not be told without direct communication which was felt to be 'too risky' at that point before we understood exactly what we were dealing with and what might happen if anyone found out and we got a formal diagnosis.
This maybe why we've had no 'external social mask' that had no connection to the inside since, once the understanding had spread through the system?