So yesterday I was on the jury of a criminal trial. The defendant had 5 charges against him related to attempting to carjack someone and using a knife to try to do it. The court process was extremely interesting (though sometimes sitting through testimony of several witnesses that repeated and repeated the same information got boring). When we went to deliberate my self-control was really tested. We had only one prosecution witness stating there was a knife involved and the police did not find the knife, so in deciding our verdict on each charge, we had to decide if we believed if a knife was actually involved. Oh MY LORD. Trying to get 12 people to agree unaniously on each charge was sooooooooo aggravating. The wonderful thing about the American justice system is that a jury consists of people from all walks of life. The aggravating thing about the American justice system is that a jury consists of people from all walks of life. Consequently, there were several individuals who did not have much education (not that I was judging them for that, as everyone's life circumstance is different and some are not lucky enough to be in a position to pursue education, but such a difference between individuals can make for a very frustrating and long debate on an issue). The problem arose when the more educated members of the jury tried to logically debate the issue before us and the others seemed to get stuck on the fact that no knife was found. Normally I would have expended a lot of energy trying to vehemently make my case and try to convince others that my conclusion was the logical conclusion (I believed a knife was involved and believed the defendant to be guilty on weapons charges). But after an hour of heated debate in the room, I elected to let the debate rage on without further input from me. Not that I gave up, but rather, I decided that attempting to sway others' opinions was futile, so I pulled back and let the discussion play out while I listened to it. The debate did get pretty heated and lasted for about two hours. Finally the group agreed that we were deadlocked on the weapons issue and that we had no choice but to find the person "not guilty" on charges involving the weapons since we could reach no unanimous decision on those charges. So the trial ended with me pretty frustrated. Afterwards when we were allowed to have our cell phones back I googled the question we were debating and found out that my point was, indeed, correct and we did have enough evidence to convict the individual on the weapons charges (sheesh!!!). But I WAS proud of myself for pulling back and not going into a tizzy like I normally would. All in all it was a really interesting experience and I had a positive personal experience as well (though others in the room were not aware of it). So I suppose I'm making progress.
Today I'm driving up to a family gathering for the afternoon and mom's coming back home with me to spend some time down here with me. So I got up and set about cleaning the house and doing laundry and such so my little pig-sty is clean and presentable for guests (not really a whole lot to do as I'm pretty much a neat freak, so really all I needed to do was tidy up a bit). Will be glad to see mom, but I'll be in "entertain the guest" mode all week... just the way I am... when someone's in "my space" I feel compelled to be the "good hostess" and tirelessly cook and entertain. I hate that I'm like that... it wears me out. Maybe I'll make it a little goal for the week to try not to engage in "entertaining" behaviors and just try to chill out. Don't know if that is actually possible... I feel genetically programmed to engage in certain behaviors and some, like this one, I find virtually impossible to fight. Anyone feel like that? I have suprised myself with the progress I've made on modifying some of my behaviors lately due to the meds and the work I've done with myself, but there's still some things I wonder if they aren't simply "just the way I am."
Anyhow, hope everyone's having a good weekend thus far
-Koshka