by galaxies » Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:19 pm
It is possible this person was faking, or it is possible he was not. The unwitting comments and apologies for them could be either valid, or an excuse to appease bad behavior on his part. If it is valid, it would be understandable. I’ve been on the apologetic side after comments made by someone inside, so it doesn’t sound implausible. But if he is faking it or not - it is still a matter to consider that being multiple isn’t a way to avoid accountability, and that someone who uses multiplicity to deny responsibility is what really ticks me off. We work very, very hard to give multiplicity a platform that opposes the Eve/Sybil position, and it's people who manipulate multiplicity into an excuse that demeans the rest of us.
On the other hand, if he’s multiple and makes no attempt to set any kind of operating system or guidelines for the group and lets others in the system commit verbal crimes, he’s as guilty as the one being a mouthy bitch. If he is faking it, he obviously has other issues that are needing assistance. I have met people who faked this diagnosis before, and besides the betrayal of trust and lies, I thought they needed some serious help. Annoyed by it of course, but empathetic too.
On the note of the names and forums and light-side occasionally posted of DID, it boils down to perspective. Acknowledging each other by name is not necessarily making light of multiplicity. It isn’t a matter of taking it less seriously than someone who is not doing this. In our family, we respect each other as individuals with their own dreams, desires, range of emotions, and ideals. Any one of us would think it disrespectful to be thought of as a fragmented by-product of child trauma, or be treated as a nameless entity without his or her own sense of self.
I’m of the mind that being multiple is a gift. It’s not a curse. It’s not a disease. It can be chaotic as hell, but it’s not barring me in the trenches. In my experience, multiplicity is on a spectrum. Some multiples need therapy. Some multiples don’t. Some function better than others. Being multiple doesn’t always have to involve a severely amnesic host and a wild assortment of individuals robbing them of their life. It’s true sometimes, but it’s not the only standard.
We were diagnosed DID years ago. For a while it was certainly disorderly. Not knowing how or why I am suddenly standing outside a house I lived in ten years ago, where I was when I missed assignments/classes/tests, how January became March with no days in between, losing friends for reasons X, Y, and Z, being ostracized, coughing up trauma on a daily basis. Be that as it may, things evolved from there. Chaos is limited. We don’t lose time because we work together well. We have a full time job. We pay our bills. We have friends. We have a fiancé who respects and responds to each of us as we are. We are still multiple, but "disorder" no longer fits our experience. I hope you can reach a place where it is not a burden for you.
The only unity between all multiples is that there exists more than one mind in a body. Nothing more or less is true. There is no proper way of being plural.
:: lola | gemini twins | cleo
:: jade | león | howlingboy | rinZU | kitty
:: linn | demi | sindri
:: jazz | jo | allyson | frogprincess
:: ell
magdella. arella. ellyn. hellene. aishellyn. luella.
ellery. rochelle. elsa. aello. asellah.
hazel. cinderell. xul. elliria. rat. aracelli. moon. damned. suku. bones. carousel.