by Excalibur » Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:58 pm
The first 6-9 months of any relationship are infatuation. It's "your attention to me, desire for me makes me feel so great about me, I can't get enough of you."
It's you loving how you view yourself - looking at yourself thru their adoration.
But infatuation fades...and with it comes objective clarity and discernment about character, intelligence, values, and goals of the other person you're dating.
I'd be a huge proponent of telling someone very early about anything this serious. HIV, STD's, mental illness, etc......that way before the infatuation which is a phase, gets so underway that everybody in the sway of it wants to think it's real - they can evaluate your situation - against their own values and needs for the present and future.
So the time to disclose this is about a month into the dating phase, as I'd see it. That way - they're not so hooked on how great they view themselves, that they say "well, we'l get past it" - with no real plan or thought - only to have many complications and conflicts later.
On something like this, just likes HIV or STD, I can see where you're not wanting to disclose this situation to complete strangers. Which is what someone is to you until there is a long period of objective and discerning evaluation of them as a person. You don't need strangers that might become enemy's knowing this to use against you in ways that you can't undo or predict.
So maybe using the guideline of HIV or STD's for this might work. If you'd require YOURSELF not to get physically intimate sexually until 6-9 months into dating...that would give you quite a bit of time to be objective about the person's character you're dating. You're entrusting them with serious information, and relying on their character not to use it against you at some point.
It'd give them a time to revel in the infatuation, without the complication of sex, or the bond that is often instilled prematurely and incorrectly with the act of sex. Give yourself that as well.
Then as the infatuation is passing, and evaluating is beginning on whether a life with 'this individual" rather than "I want a relationship for needs of my own definition" being the focus - then reveal your situation.
Because your condition does affect the quality and type of life they'll have as a married person, and as a parent, and possibly whether theywould want to bear children vs. adopt with you.
Most people as the mture have a vision of how they want their life to be - in general. It's very vague and broad in youth - but it's more specific with maturity and age and lifestyle development.
If your condition is going to eliminate a good portion of what they want in thier lives - the time they can make that decision most responsibly to you both - is post infatuation, but prior to attachment to you as a person, and a potential future with you.
As you've waited 4 months, and infatuation is still in play, while discussion is still vague while you think it's not, and what each of you has as a vision and script in your head is 'how my life will be when I find a partner" vs. "how my life would be with this person in partnership" - let it ride.
As you become objective, you might find this is not the woman you admire or respect, or want to spend your life with. And if that is the case, why divulge this information.
While you're letting this unfold.......it would be a good use of some of your private time to evaluate ethically what you beleive is the best approach within your values and standards for the future - in disclosure of your condition.
It affects your employers, your relationships, your life in general - and disclosure appropriately and discerning the appropriate timing for it is imperative if you're to live in anything but desperation and fear.