Holy hots, why not child sex robots?

Grumpy paedophile Tom O'Caroll has a rather fun blog post this week concerning moral panic over sex bots.

https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/

Sex-capable robots are on their way, and whoever they're designed to look like, I don't think there's any credible argument for them being any more immoral than the vibrators owned by [many of] today's women.

Obviously there will be people kicking off if some of these 'masturbatory aids' (that's exactly what they'll be) resemble children, but at the end of the day they're talking about toys not real people. Inevitably, someone who owns one of them will go on to become a real offender, and the moralising brigade will blame the robot for being a step on the road, but exactly the same argument gets made for banning porn, violent movies, heavy metal music etc, etc. The responsibility for any crime should always be with the perpetrator, never an entertainment source.

I believe child sex bots and CGI porn are the way forward in the management of paedophiles, and I would suggest, perhaps necrophiles. Along with the expansion of counseling type support services. I do believe that paedophilia in particular is becoming an option as a sexuality in the same way homosexuality did. I don't believe the wait-till-it-happens then jail the guy approach has been working or will ever work. It is only by allowing people to admit their desires and provide them with options to manage them that you will begin to see substantial reductions in these kinds of offenses. A corpse sex bot would be an especially easy thing since it would require no moving parts....

I've looked at prop corpses and skeletons, but they're just not 'human' enough for me, if that makes sense. That's not to say they wouldn't work for other necrophiles.

For everyone else, I think the idea is a great way forward. We're not far away from having artificial intelligence software that could make such robots really good company for people, and at some point there'll probably be demands from technosexual activists to legalise marriage between people and their android friends!

Graveyard76 wrote:I've looked at prop corpses and skeletons, but they're just not 'human' enough for me, if that makes sense. That's not to say they wouldn't work for other necrophiles.

For everyone else, I think the idea is a great way forward. We're not far away from having artificial intelligence software that could make such robots really good company for people, and at some point there'll probably be demands from technosexual activists to legalise marriage between people and their android friends!

I think it is japan where men marry characters on their gameboys...

It's started then!

If I may ask, what about cosmetic surgeries and having sex with other adults who look like children?

I don't see anything wrong with sex toys. But every time I hear about things like this, I wonder why so many people who speak of the future and things like sex bots, often focus on something so asocial as sex bots rather than advances in things like cosmetic surgery for transpeople.

I'd like to hope that, by the time robotics and A.I. are advanced enough to make sexbots much more advanced and interesting to people than just sex dolls, there would be cosmetic surgeries to look like how I and many others would like to look like.

Anyway, I'm worried that child sex robots will be illegal. I remember reading some articles about it and there was a lot of hysteria and pedophile hatred from a lot of people. And people have already gone to jail for sex dolls with childlike appearance. I fear we'll have to struggle for our right to have something like that when the technology is available.

I hope that by the time something like this can exist, that it will be illegal, and people won't try to police what kind of body type can be sexualized. And then the technology will exist for me to look like a child myself. And that people won't try to body police me and try to put me in jail or prison for doing that to my body.

Which do you think will happen first, incredibly realistic childlike sex robots, or cosmetic surgeries to look like children?

The representation is the problem here and I can see why. It's morally disturbing.

I guess you're right, that makes sense that, even though we're not supposed to judge a book by it's cover or care about looks over anything. Both sexuality and people morals are tied to it in some way.

I guess people can't help what they see and it look worrying and upsettingly similar to something that is harmful and hurtful, just in body type. And treating fictional characters, drawings, dolls, non-concious robots, and things like that, as feeling similar and like the real thing, even though they're not real. Because of appearance and representation. And try to prosecute people based upon that.

But people can't help what body type they're attracted to. And it's body policing to say that people can't look a certain way. Telling me something like "don't sexualize children" I understand from a moral and ethical standpoint. That's something I feel like I have a choice in the matter of. Telling me not to be attracted to a body type that is "too young looking" is impossible.

It feels like trying to run up a wall and ignore everything fundamental and the foundations of my sexuality. To live my life without any self expression for my sexuality on any level that my sexuality works and feels. And to live a life of sexual repression and frustration, unable to expression even a tiny piece of my sexuality, or what makes me, me.

When people say that things like this "normalize" and "create" this attraction, or "reinforce" it, rather than being an outlet. When this has been the only sexuality I've known or been capable of having since I was a young child. How can people not believe it's an outlet when you can't learn attraction to a body type and you can't reinforce or make a sexuality like mine go away. Not without some kind of neuroscience advancements and surgeries that would take away a fundamental part of who I am.

Sexual outlets do exist. Everyone has them. Ignoring sexuality doesn't make it go away. It just makes you feel frustrated and repressed. Sexual repression isn't the answer for anybody.

I'm sad that seeing my sexuality hurts other people, I don't want to see others in pain or disturbed. But I can't change these feelings, and I don't want a life of sexual frustration and suppression.

TaintedAgria wrote:Not without some kind of neuroscience advancements and surgeries that would take away a fundamental part of who I am.

Fundamental part of you, yes. Necessary part of you, no. You would be better off without it, because you would function better.

Sexual outlets do exist. Everyone has them. Ignoring sexuality doesn't make it go away. It just makes you feel frustrated and repressed. Sexual repression isn't the answer for anybody.

I've been where you are. I made myself suffer though and my mind learned to function without the urge to act on those desires. Now when I get a bad thought, I distract myself by consciously focusing on my senses rather than my thoughts. For example, I focus on my breathing and soon enough, something else catches my attention and I forget all about what I was thinking about before.

I don't have access to any sex dolls and honestly, I just view it as a lame substitute. But that's me. To me, if I'm not going to do the real thing, there's no point in indulging those fantasies in any other way because it's not the same as what you actually want. It's never going to feel the same, but if it does for you, then all the more power to you.