mazeoflife wrote:cumulusjames wrote:Because much about my childhood was painful. I think she talks mostly nonsense, but she pressed some buttons. The only thing that was interesting is that she talked about neural pathways and mindfulness.
What do you think of her idea that pedophiles can change their attractions if they can reclaim their innocence? I think I agree with her idea about the idea of pedophiles being attracted to children as a way to fulfill their lack of innocence. We (pedophiles) are subconsciously trying to connect with that part of ourselves that we have lost sight of.
I think we need to be careful not to offend the so called fixed paedophiles here. But I was halfway through a science degree when I was raided, and I have been reading popular science books for a long time, that is why I believe that you can change if you want to, and I can revert back to my 'normal' sexuality, given the chance. And I did just that with an extremely attractive 23 yr old a couple of weeks ago.
My view is this: from an evolutionary perspective orientation can only describe attraction to gender. Preference is how you would describe body shape/personality/age etc. What is enjoyable about emotional intimacy and the enjoyment of sex are not the same thing, as married heterosexual people want you to believe. People disliked gays because we have sex for the sake of having sex. What is truly sex about? Sensations you feel in your body. What is producing those sensations is just a story in your mind. Whether that story is old man or young boy, the sensations are generally the same. Using mindfulness and paying attention only to the fact sensations are pleasurable, not engaging in stories about who is providing those sensations could be a valid way to change ones preferences, but leave ones orientation intact.
When I gave oral sex to men when I was a boy, something I remember noticing was that they hardly looked at me when I looked up. So what was important? The physical sensation or the fact I was a boy?