Tomax1984 wrote:I guess my question is, would a rational normal person think that I am being unreasonable in my assessment that I caused a car accident?
I'm afraid the short answer is, yes.
The longer answer is probably more useful.
People with OCD need to come to the realization that we live in a world of
probability, not
absolute assurance.
For instance, today I went driving. As far as I know, I didn't cause an accident. Can I know absolutely, 100%, that I didn't cause an accident? No. But I know how accidents happen, and generally speaking if it is happening in your proximity at that moment, you will notice it. If you cause it to happen, you will most likely notice the ramiifcations (and more often than not, you will be involved in it).
None of those things happened while I was driving. So the probability of me causing an accident is
very very low. Do I know 100%? No, because I didn't stop every few hundred feet, get out of the car, and look around. So I live with that probability factor, and my life goes on.
In the world of OCD, life does not go on that way. Everything becomes "what if?", and "how do I know?". Those questions fuel an obsession to find 100% truth.
Of course, it is never found, because DOUBT will always be present. All you have to say is, "what if", and the process starts all over again.
Part of positive cognitive change is to let go of the hunt for 100% assurance.
Otter.
P.S I merged the new post you made since they are about the same thing.