RopedIn wrote:He's lied to his entire family and I.
She has been apparently waiting all these years in hopes of him coming to his senses?.
I can relate to that. I married in a foreign country and divorced here a year later. I considered myself divorced, and yet I still felt there was a possibility I could move there and resume a broken marriage, which wasn't broken there. I didn't lead my ex to believe that was happening. It was mutually over. She signed the papers here. But, we stayed in contact. I went there occasionally (as friends, no intimacy). Looking back on it, I believe my motivation returning was that I was a "big fish in a little pond." But, mentally, I think I liked to have options available to my narrative. I could paint that option blacker as I sought something here, then paint it lighter when whatever I tried here didn't work. It added a rationality or escape to an increasingly irrational and inescapable existence. I didn't firmly consider it over (not a possibility of an option) until 2010, about 6 years after the divorce.
He could be more malignant and psychopathic, deliberately being intimate with two women (like a bigomist, hiding the other person). That's not how I considered myself. At least cognitively, I didn't have an emotional investment with two people at the same time. If I dated/met someone here I be honest that we divorced, but I liked it in that other country and had continued to think about going there. I was playing both sides, but I had some level of conscience that I wasn't committing infidelity (missing the point that I was doing something much worse, self-serving in a much more systemic way, without regard to my ex or the women I might "test drive" for comparison here.).
So, I'm not trying to say it's a minor thing. But, I wouldn't see it (especially at the time) in the way a non probably would like bigomy. It seemed very proper and explainable.
-- Sun Oct 11, 2015 3:49 am --
Spaced wrote:It appears to be about an extremely gullible wife.
That's probably true, if @roped's description of the wife's complicity. He's probably given her some "I need to find myself" nonsense and she thinks the hope he'll return is better than being the cause of the more permanent abandonment.
In my case it wouldn't be about me abandoning her. It would be about me making her abandon me. As long as she's willing to be like that, it's supply. "It's not my fault she won't leave me. I've done everything I can." But, in the meantime, he gets supply by having that option. Having someone waiting for him, pining.