Kheo Dofh wrote:The personnalties have the same identity.
Funny thing: The "original" personnality is the least active one.
I'm not torn, I'm 100% untrusting of anyone.
And that's supposed to comfort me how? A.D.I.D.A.M.
We thought so too, or tried to force that till it just had to be acknowledged. ~shrugs~
Trying to force memories of being partially aware and being an influence, but not in control to be... like memories of being in control/fully present got too hard to maintain.
There is no "original" here. There's just me. And me. And me and me and me.
And more that are all me. Some just have names now. All of me thought we had the same identity, but it turns out that we were wrong. We all share the identity of "me". We just aren't each other, as I said.
Then why would you be here, trusting us with this info? Just something to think about.
So you don't trust. That's your choice. Only you can change that; nobody's going to force you, nobody CAN change that, and it's your right and freedom to feel and act that way, and to chose that. I'm not going to argue with you about it, as it's not my place to say, and I get the feeling that you'd rather not have others disrespect you by implying that you "have" to do what they think you ought to, or that you somehow don't have a choice or whatnot.
Sorry if I came off that way; it wasn't intended.
I'm not sure how it's supposed to help. I didn't write it. I don't actually remember what was written and I don't think I'm inclined to go back and read or drag out whatever part did and get the info from them.
But, regardless, it was said because whatever said it thought it might help. I don't know you; I can't read your mind. All I can do is offer what seems useful to me in case it might be helpful. And if it isn't, that's not really in my control. So. ~shrugs~
Also, I don't know what your acronym means.