Our partner

IFS and me

Dissociative Identity Disorder message board, open discussion, and online support group.

Moderators: Snaga, NewSunRising, lilyfairy

Re: IFS and me

Postby andiKirkwood » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:49 pm

Allcoulors wrote:This sounds more like an ego state treatment to me than did/alter treatment.

no its not therapy for "ego states" its therapy for "Sub personalities"

having a distinctive personality (your word alter) underneath another personality.

Sub personalities have their own memories, perceptions, behaviors, beliefs, emotions.

they are a different kind of alters. "sub" personalities and "alternate" personalities. Andi has both kinds.

if this was Andi being angry and scared yes that would be ego state. but this is not andi being angry and scared. Andi is feeling Sally's hate and scared. Sally is a sub personality under andi's personality.

Sally thinks of herself on the bottom bunk of the bunk bed and andi on the top bunk. two different people one under the other. both fully aware and active at the same time.

-- Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:54 am --

Sarandipity wrote:Reading this is making me think twice again about going to a specialist. I thought by now they would have a set way to treat not options. So it looks like they still are not sure what they are talking about.

The naming of parts having roles seems ok, I don't think I fit into a role name, I feel like if I had a role it'd be "stabiliser" because mostly I'm out when life needs stabilization and I lack emotions to an extreme where I think I'm probably fitting ASPD because I have rage and shame at weakness but not much else. So I wouldn't say I'm ANP other than I can do all "normal" stuff without trauma or life stress effecting me. And I can definitely see other parts have and hold many more emotions than I do but they're not just emotions, like a mixture of functions and emotions and wants and needs - I'd say they're more ANP. Plus there are suppressed emotions here that are seperate from parts, don't have a function and were just seperated off like an emotional cloud and if not kept an eye on will latch onto vulnerable alters - maybe they're EP but part I wouldn't call them.

Ego state ideas I'm not convinced on because different parts have ego states of their own, are aware of ego states and know what ego state they're communicating in because we did alot of therapy and courses and studied psychotherapy. So I don't think for us putting parts as being one ego state applies.

So now not only am I gonna have to seek specialist therapist of which there are only 2 specialist centres in this country, now I'm gonna have check in what way they're going to want to play with the brain. Feeling like I can't trust the experts theories again. But we don't like to read too much because we don't like to get caught in "oh maybe we're this" which is what happened before we heard of DID and were convinced we might be narcissistic or BPD or neurotic etc etc. We've gone over Bipolar about 5 times since coming out of hospital because that is yet another diagnosis and it's not helpful trying to convince yourself you have something so we can fit into what they're saying so we want to avoid reading too much DID stuff because then we might try to fit into that. We just know there's more than one of us and I have to make sure I remember that or it all gets a bit overwhelming when they start coming back.

We call it body amnesia. You're in the body too long and you can't remember the internal world, forget there's other parts and think you're a whole person. At the moment the only things keeping me from forgetting is that 1. I miss my sister, she's internal and playing games in Terra Magica. She came in the body once in years and only because the twins tricked her and told her "go out there, you're robbing a bank in Paris" she thought it was an area of one of there games. Then thought "this isn't Paris. Oh B. I'm in the body. Ok. Guess this is work" and then the second day she didn't go to work and went shopping. So she's unreliable and does what she wants, stays internal and I miss her. We spent alot of time together the last few years but she won't come out here. 2. Coming here helps me remember. I actually read stuff here every day, more than once a day and don't reply just to make myself think "oh yeah DID" otherwise I'll forget. 3. The bf, he reminds me because he knows. So instead of what usually happens when I'm here all the time and I say to whoever "go away, I don't love you, I've never loved you" because I haven't I have been able to speak to him more honestly - he asked me one thing, when I just got here into the body and wasn't caught up on all the daily life stuff I'd missed and only Patrick would be able to answer him "sorry the person you are trying to contact is currently unavailable" which has actually made it a bit better. I'm not just fobbing someone off saying "I don't love you, go away" I can actually have a convo so it's holding off the amnesia a bit.

Sorry that I'm going on. Ignore me. Paul.

no sorry no ignore like what you wrote getting therapy is scarey.
andiKirkwood
Consumer 5
Consumer 5
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:27 pm
Local time: Fri Aug 15, 2025 8:49 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


ADVERTISEMENT

Re: IFS and me

Postby Dwelt » Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:49 pm

For anyone who's confused about IFS : it's normal.

I've read a presentation of the IFS made by a group of french-speaker researchers, who wrote a book about dissociation, dissociative disorders and therapies that can be used for it (if a french T come around here, it's "Psychothérapie de la dissociation et du trauma" by Joanna Smith and all. - I just love that book and highly recommend it).

IFS looked good on paper for DID people, so last year, I bought the book written by its creator.
And well, I like the logic behind this therapy : it makes me think of the attachment theory and I use it to work with my own system ; also, as a psych student, think it's interesting to keep some parts of it in mind.
But it's clear to me that it's not primarily meant to be a DID therapy. There's a lot of things that can't really be use on a DID person.

Like a lot of other therapies stating that everyone is "naturally divided" who talk about "parts", it can be used for DID, but as the book about dissociation said at the end of the part dedicated to IFS : it has to be adapted. If the T doesn't know how DID works and doesn't adapt the therapy, everyone will end up confused.
.

French person with ADHD
Former partial DID
Functional multiplicty, highly integrated
User avatar
Dwelt
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 11:01 am
Local time: Sat Aug 16, 2025 2:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IFS and me

Postby TheGangsAllHere » Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:34 pm

andiKirkwood wrote:having a distinctive personality (your word alter) underneath another personality.

Sub personalities have their own memories, perceptions, behaviors, beliefs, emotions.

they are a different kind of alters. "sub" personalities and "alternate" personalities. Andi has both kinds.

if this was Andi being angry and scared yes that would be ego state. but this is not andi being angry and scared. Andi is feeling Sally's hate and scared. Sally is a sub personality under andi's personality.

Sally thinks of herself on the bottom bunk of the bunk bed and andi on the top bunk. two different people one under the other. both fully aware and active at the same time.


What you are calling a sub-personality, I would call an alter (due to a dissociative disorder) with whom I have co-consciousness. And I consider them to be completely equal personalities, not subordinate at all.

To my mind, an "alternate" personality and a "sub" personality are the same--both are separate from you because of trauma. The only difference is how much of a dissociative barrier there is between them and you. Having less of a dissociative barrier does not make them LESS of a person, and in my system, it does NOT make them subordinate at all. They are treated by me and by my T as just as valid and worked with in exactly the same way. So whether Oliver is asking a question himself or I'm passing it along to the T, it's treated the same. My littlest Little never completely fronts--she's a toddler and I can feel her feelings and pass on her requests to the T. I don't have ANY alters who take over in such a way that I'm completely not aware of what's happening.

If I'm talking about a part that never fronts, then I might think of them as being somehow "behind" the person fronting, but I would never think of them as being "underneath" in a less important sort of way.

Thank you for clarifying this, andiKirkwood. You've helped me understand what bothers us so much about this way of thinking about parts--it's the idea that parts with whom I'm co-conscious are somehow of a lesser status or importance. We all take issue with that, obviously, especially since we are a system with a lot of co-consciousness.

So, again, if this works for you, then that's great. It could never work for us.
TheGangsAllHere
Consumer 6
Consumer 6
 
Posts: 4755
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:15 am
Local time: Fri Aug 15, 2025 6:49 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to Dissociative Identity Disorder Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests