tribeofone wrote:All dissociative disorders are similar, with common symptoms, and kindred causes of origin; however, each disorder develops in a different manner and produces a disease of its own unique nature, and falls under different structural complexity. They commonly depend on a schism of the emotional and apparently normal personality, and depending on the causes and the neurological response of the patient, the personality may split or integrate in unique ways...
Quantum, I don't mean to be rude, but your style is beginning to irk me as well a little. I know you're trying to help riddle and you've posted a lot of good information, but I think it is worth pointing out that yours is a very specific view of dissociative disorders (although one you have obviously arrived at by reading a lot of medical literature).
I see where you're coming from, but I wouldn't base my entire view of dissociative disorders on a few posts. For the record, I used to the word "disease" to refer to the state of being ill due to symptoms of the disorder.
I find the word "disease" frankly offensive. Up to you if you want to see yourself as "disordered" or "diseased" but I do not. I also am not a "patient" and I do not have a "split personality" in need of "integration". Also, while the structural model of dissociation is a popular model of explanation, it is not the only one. I find it a bit troubling to be honest that you profess these things as if they were some kind of natural law.
Why does that trouble you? There is a natural law. Although you may believe that this short and simple explanation is favoring the structural model as the Ultimate Truth, I definitely don't believe that to be so, and I didn't make it sound that way.
Dissociative identity disorder is a medical condition, and it
is a disorder. Disorder doesn't mean illness or "special person" or "you're different." It's up to you if you want to pretend that it is not a disorder, or what have you. When I refer to disease I mean that the person with DID may be ill from it, as in
not well, as most people are. After you become well, you are no longer ill... Why is "mental illness" offensive to you? Moreover, I didn't say that
anyone was in need of integration.
Again, I know you're trying to help, but just because you have adopted this medical model for yourself(ves) does not mean it is The Truth for everyone.
Um, okay...?
Personally, I do not see one model as being the only accurate representation or diagnostic tool. Neither do I pretend that parallel models or varied theories are entirely separate and should not all be considered as a whole. You're being defensive and making assumptions about my view and arguing against things that I haven't said.
I didn't say my view was the ultimate truth and I did not say it was beyond question. I did not say that
you were mentally ill, but what with is happening to the OP I would
suspect that he is not well, because of a dissociative disorder. If you think he is all well, then maybe you can explain how his self-harm, emotional outbursting, severe stress, and memory loss are all signs of "being well."
If you have a problem with my scientific view, that's fine, but there's no need to accuse me of all these things that I haven't done. If you have a different model that you'd like to bring up, FEEL FREE. I agree with most clinical theory pertaining to DID. I'm not
attacking your opinion, feel free to contradict mine at any point. It seems more like you just have issues with the words that I use. If you want to describe these conditions in a different way, FEEL FREE. No one is stopping you.