MrEmMak wrote:Anyone else watch cops (or any other type of situation with a bad guy), see a guy getting dragged into a cop car crying, telling his wife to just use his check to pay the bills and apologizing. . . .
I find normal people say, "well, he shouldn't have done the crime." or "good, he belongs behind bars."
I feel bad for the guy. It seems like he's doing his best and is just a massive, horrible failure. He's disappointed in himself but doesn't even begin to know what to do differently. I would be happy to talk to the guy, get his thoughts and emotions in order. . . . Seems like regular people are like, screw him, he made that bed.
They need help not punishment. Tell me: in justice where's the line between punishment and vengeance? Well that's the question one has to answer. But most don't. Most don't care. Were it their loved one, no doubt you'd see them fighting for them, saying "he just needs help", or, "such and such occurred..." They'd suddenly quit being so opinionated. It's easy to do what you say 'normal' people do as, well, in general, people know nothing. The desire for punishment and vengeance is amongst mankind's most primitive instincts; as is protecting and defending your brood. We're supposedly more advanced now though, or so many would like to believe or tell us. So why do we throw to the wolves the very same people we'd be helping and defending simply as they have no connection to us? I think survival instinct tells us that our family and friends surviving helps us survive, those others, the 'bad guys' are not only not family or friends but they are potentially dangerous to friends and family. So, ultimately it's a selfish desire in a sense. We defend those who contribute to our own survival. How we perceive the 'bad guys' and 'justice' is more than often motivated by selfishness. "They are not of me, and they are a potential threat to my family and tribe (tribe being friends) so they must be removed" our minds tell us, I believe. We live in a so-called modern civilization; not a tribal community. We have the ability to not listen to everything our brain tells us more than any other being on Earth, so why are we behaving like primates?
Many of these people grew up in crime infested areas, and on top of that their areas had little in way of opportunity. Some grew up with bad role-models, or no role-models to speak of. Some began to have problems in early childhood but it were ignored and they were simply "punished", either doing nothing for their behavior, or worsening it. Whereas if people had paid attention that criminal seed growing in them could have been plucked out and destroyed before it began to take root. They don't even try to distinguish normal acting up from something more anti-social as that takes work, and it costs money as well. It's easier anyway. They're too much trouble. Add to that, many teachers are underpaid and bitter. Working with children in a school setting can twist people. Children are difficult and it's frustrating and easy to lose sight of and understand that their mind aren't fully developed, and that they're not bad, just learning and still growing.
But doesn't it cost less in the end and isn't it less trouble for all of society if they stopped being criminals? Or, what if many never became criminals in the first place? That is, helped in early childhood.
A decent school psychologist could have and/or could be been in place; if the school is huge, there could have been, or could be an entire team. The child could get sent to them after many, repeated visits to the principles office and after-school 'detention' (prison-light, essentially) failed, who through evaluation could have had them sent to a perhaps more qualified psychologist for regular sessions in order to seek out and destroy that criminal, anti-social seed and give them the same chance we all have.
For those who are criminals aren't we applying the same stupid, lazy, cheap 'solution' towards them? Shouldn't we have rehabilitation instead? Sure, some will never change, but I believe most can. Some don't even understand what they are doing is wrong, or why it is wrong. Some do understand that they're doing wrong and want to stop but are unable, or feel unable somehow. Some don't have the life-skills and knowledge as you or me. Some can't function in society.
Shouldn't we all have a chance?
Can we not use logic combined with compassion (two other traits unique to humans) to broaden our view of the world? See everyone to an extent --we have to focus on our family and friends, that's natural and important-- as at least something like our sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, nephews, cousins, mothers, fathers et al?
Well, perhaps that's the problem? Looking around, I find the world severely lacking in both logic and compassion in equal measure.
This reminds me of something Nietzsche wrote... comes out of Thus Spoke Zarathustra I believe:
"What is an Ape to Mankind? Either an amusement or a painful embarrassment. What will We be to the next stage of Mankind?"
Edit: typos, un-typos.
"I assess the power of a will by how much resistance, pain, torture it endures and knows how to turn it to its advantage." -- Friedrich Nietzsche