by Twistedmister » Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:09 am
Rage. Rage is a good way to cope with rejection. Atleast temporarily.
Devaluation..........that also works well temporarily.
But those are weapons we're all equipped with here........
I think courage is the most important component of any coping technique.
Regardless of what you believe.........all that matters is that you believe it. Changing those beliefs.........requires your replacing one belief with another.
So courage..........for all, comes in the form of understanding. Like with all these techniques you've talked about and listed..........the reason those work amazingly well for some and don't work at all for others...........is one's own belief in their validity. (courage)
For me............understanding what is at the root, of why a person values anything.........is a first step into summoning up the courage to address my own beliefs about my own values.
(in this case, the value i place on the person who i feel rejected/abandoned me)
It helps me dial down............the intense idealisation i have, about the nature of our relationship. Especially the unrealistic expectation.........that it will never end. Because of course, all relationships do.
Realising where my value of anything comes from (emotion+reason) helps me to understand the basic nature of the equation at work.
The very fact that i have such intense "disordered" emotions............helps me to have the courage to believe, in my understanding of what emotions are. Where they come from.............(if you don't believe in evolution, that might be a tricky concept!)
But yeah........seeing my emotions, as the evolutionary adaptation they are...........understanding where that adaptation came from...........helps me to de-mystify feeling.
Which in turn, helps me to de-mystify and de-deify my own feelings.
Undertanding the irrationality of feeling........(that is, the irrationality of placing such importance on any specific feeling)................allows me to alleviate the delusional aspect of any situation i am in.
Since we know emotion+reason= value............understanding the malleable and random nature of emotion.......is the key to unlocking the fallability in the validity of sticking to any such value.
Our values are our emotions. Our reason, can only be experienced through our emotions.....it can only be formed, from emotion.
So it's all really just a cycle........ I fear things, love things, because of my understanding of them. My belief in my understanding of them, comes from the emotional connect i have in the validity of that understanding.
So whether i think i'm being abandoned or not........is the exact same as whether or not i feel abandoned or not.
I can soothe myself by understanding the reasons why my fears are delusional in the sense that i have a disorder.
Or i can soothe myself by understanding the reasons why fears are delusional.........in the sense that any value, could be considered delusional.
Understanding the basic and inherent irrationality of thought...........any thought, helps me to find the courage to tackle unpleasant thoughts, all the easier.
So in that way...........feelings of being abandoned, can be tackled on both the "i have BPD" front and the "i can change my mind about anything" front.
As since it's illogical to feel any particular way about any particular thing.........as there is no logic..........then there is no reason, to hold any beliefs.
So a person can have the courage to feel how they want about anything they want, whenever they want...........as their is no value in anything, other than the value you yourself place on anything.
Right, wrong.......good and bad. These things are all equally right and wrong good and bad.
It's all how we feel about them. We have many different reasons for our feelings........some we deem to be more important and some less.............cultivating the courage to be able to choose, however that choice manifests itself........is all that life is.
The only difference between a person and a rock.........is that a person believes there is a difference.
The only similarity between a person and a rock........is that a person believes there is a similarity.
1. It could be said...........that people aren't rocks.
2. It could also be said.....that people are rocks.
3.It could also be said.........that people both are rocks and aren't rocks.
4.It could also be said.........that people are and also aren't........both rocks and not rocks.
In the case of 1. Well, i'm sure we all agree people aren't rocks. Rocks don't type.
In the case of 2. The universe is just a giant soup of molecules. Everything is connected to everything else, by the very definiton of their being anything. There could be no tall people, if there were no short people. The difference between any 2 things, is actually just a relationship between those 2 things.
What am I? Am i my arm? Am i my leg? Am i my thoughts?
What makes me me, is that i am not the things i think i am not. I am not you, therefore i am me. I am not my computer, therefore i am me...........when really, it could be said that i'm just a collection of molecules that is connected to all the other molecules in existence. That existence itself, is connected to non-existence......through the difference between the two.
It's like if a person was looking out at a storm........and saw 2 tornadoes. A person could say "there are 2 tornadoes".........and that would be true. But another person, could just see wind. As that's what tornadoes are. That would also be true.
In the case of 3. we've already established that people aren't rocks in 1. And we've already established that people are rocks in 2. So we know that people both are and aren't rocks.
In the case of 4. We've established that people are rocks 1. and aren't rocks 2.
And are both rocks and not rocks 3.
It could be said, that people are rocks and aren't rocks.......and are both rocks and not rocks........and are both rocks and not rocks aswell as being NOT both rocks and not rocks.
Because in the case of 4..........being NOT both rocks and not rocks...................is derived from the understanding, that there is no difference between 1. 2. 3. or 4.
That the difference between 1. 2. 3. 4. Is derived from the understanding of 1. and 2. and 3. and their components.
All 4 explanations.........are both valid and invalid. All 4 explanations are equally the same as they are different.
If you don't fully grasp Madhyamaka philosophy............that's alright.
The point i'm trying to make.............is that all things are subject to our interpretation.
Just as we use DBT and CBT and any other therapy, to shape our emotion...........we can also shape our understanding of the nature of reality. Our understanding is the nature of reality.
So when i do feel abandoned...............i do try to see why i'm usually irrationally overreacting...........but i can and do also try, seeing my being abandoned as not such a bad thing.
You don't have to feel bad about feeling bad.
Feeling bad, isn't bad..........it's just a feeling.
So attacking the fear/pain of abandonment..............on 2 different levels........can be useful if one approach isn't working or if one is in a different "mood/personality" and can't access the preferred approach as easily.
Having courage (confidence) in as many approaches as possible.........lends to an even greater ability to control some aspect of what can seem uncontrollable.
Borderline