by Shazam » Mon May 06, 2013 4:34 pm
I think I'm in a similar boat. Basically, as I've learned about BPD, I've realized a big part of my problem has been lack of boundaries... I've often played that "fixer" or "helper" role, and as I've started getting away from that and putting my own needs/wants first, I quickly become a lot less appealing to the people who would have been benefiting from my fixing and helping. (My mom, for example, is a lot less interested in seeing me and talking to me since I've started pushing back on her eternal boundary violations. Which is actually 100% okay with me LOL)
And I hear you about selfishness being this surprisingly common trait out in the world. It's like I've been raised to self-sacrifice, and I thought everyone else was too, but I'm realizing that isn't true -- that instead, "healthy" people seem to have quite a sizable bit of selfishness guiding their living. They are easily able to look at someone else's problem and say "sorry, can't help ya, it ain't my problem."
So yeah, I think it follows that in such a world, there probably aren't anywhere near as many "genuinely close" relationships out there as I had imagined. Much more than I used to think, many relationships are less about mutual growth and more about self-interests of the parties involved. Not that there's anything wrong with it... it's just life. (Sometimes I think the animal kingdom can give perspective on human life... and among animals, there sure isn't much altruism... it's all about self-interest.)
Overall, your overall idea makes lots of sense: healing BPD no doubt involves major re-defining of what relationships are all about. And that will result in fewer "close" relationships. Having 2 or 3 close relationships is probably much more common than having 20 or 30.