I would like to make clear when im talking about the 1st aspect of the universe unity im not talking about one handness or one dimensional or even an inner sense that everything is converged on one or whatever the hell anyone means by oneness working such ambigious termanology I suppose we have to realise im working mostly with english the oneness im talking about is an underlying unity in the sense that every action in the universe is connected or alessent at a unity based superinfinity as best as I can describe it. So im not telling you to seek out a oneness ambigiously or bigiously so or what ever as you can see at least with english covering the issue is akward.

When im talking about chireality I am talking about two handedness.

So why not tree handness is this what your talking about when you say triatemption well no not exactly more so not at all am i sugesstion triatemption is directly equal to three handedness.

What it is see evermore so young relaties start off at least chireal in gut aspect. This reality may well have been going on for more than an efinite amount of earth rotations around the sun quite probably from internal aspect perspective and far more than certianly from a gracial perspective relative to last years orbit however relitive to some other gracial earth like orbit round a sun lets say this reality just started in less than a blink of an eye and that eye hasnt even finished its bink yet to which a lot happens in such an amazing blink.

So yes its relative to realities age very young but relative to the norm which is and always is ever more so young realities this reality age is quite a normal age.

Going back to the why two handedness why not three handedness well this reality is an optimal norm for young realities thats why its closest to the bottom so it can work as it evolves quickest with energy data as it spins down into the deepths of enternity and the maintianence issue is that quarticle progression is low enough to be optimal plus it takes far less relative time to relativly internal wise sustain than the more dynamic three handed form set also the triatemtion levels for a norm three handed reality are more dynamic hence all in all a more elite quarticle progression.

Why not four handed well four handed is essentially an anoluge of 2 handed and 5 why not five or other prime number handed realities again its not if a number handedness is a prime thats the issue bar handed symmetry issues what your doing here if you ask such questions is applying you perfectionary findingings of counting to a far more dynamic problem but yes you would far less lighty be the way you are were chirality not such an optimal hence such a young norm ect the issue in itself does really cover much ground where triatemption is concerned.

The eye of grace so to speak sit just off from the efinitly dimensional top of this reality and that aspect of this reality is really quite young the equivellent to just after dinosar times so our internal quartic progressional development relative to the outer triatemptional fluxuality is still low hence most humans havent even barly imagined a half decent planetry surface alien let alone the reality reached a very high evolutional state.

It is at this point we come back to the journey traversing realities of earth how could such be even possible hardly anyone knows how to even count with two numbers at once well youd be looking at the issue from the wrong perspective from a homosapian in trouble born yesterday ages to go before i travel to the nearest star perspective and youd be missing the full depth of whats going on with earth. Open up that third eye a little more stop worrying about some silicone you use working from counting with your hand for a minute like your so clever that youve supassed analogue intelligence with a few numbers what crap even though technilogical evolution is useful to the issue.