My parents hired a company to "help" me.

It is like the Star magazine of journalism in terms of health care companies. Serious physicians do not consider this company "good" or "high quality" health care, but because the company is so big and allows any smothering dilettante to participate, it has a major following. It does not need evidence of your behavior to start monitoring you.

The company stalks and harasses me, 24hrs/day.
The follow me while I'm driving and surround the buildings I'm in and yell.
My doctors agree I am not hallucinating.

I am trying to identify the name of the company. It is a national program. I need to sue this company so that it cannot so easily target mental health patients without their informed consent. In the state of CT, it is illegal to initiate interventions without the consent of the patient, so your parents cannot violate this law or enable the company to violate this law. I have connections to lawyers and I have evidence of their abuse. All I need is the name of the company. No mental health patient should have to suffer at the hands of someone harassing them on a whim. You deserve quality health care, not some unqualified $#%^ standard euphemism.

They can also manipulate you to think you are "hallucinating", when really, they are surrounding you and yelling at you. You are not "hearing voices". People are targeting and attacking you. No mental health patient should have to suffer from abuse and deception. So, I am going to find out who this company is really and make sure your rights are protected.

Does anyone know the name of this company?

Yes, they do. And your parents.

Lack of evidence does not prove something does not exist.

I believe I have an active implantable medical devices (AIMD) that enables mental health professionals and my family to listen to my thoughts and see what I see. It is probably inserted in the spine, in a foremen. I think it is used for at-risk patients, for victims of sexism, and, of course, for pathetic princess projects.

Since we cannot prove the device exists, we must begin to talk about it in groups or in therapy. It is especially important for mental health patients' rights to be respected. We must have and establish limitations and boundaries. Implanting a device without informed consent can constitute battery. And if mental health professionals or their euphemisms are stalking and harassing us, those are also crimes. If they are changing your breathing in public, or permanently altering the functioning of your heart and lungs, that must also constitute some form of crime as well.

You should have the right to refuse treatment, in all cases, unless you are at-risk - and there is evidence of this. Trespassing into your room and touching your things is also impermissible. This extreme invasiveness violates your rights and it is illegal to initiate interventions without informed consent and awareness of the patient.

However, if the device weren't used for us, then a dictator would probably have a free-for-all and we'd all be mice in a fascist circus. I think the device should be banned altogether, no exceptions. Thoughts are not evidence. One can think "left" and turn right and there is no law that can forbid it. There is no obligation for you to think with truth. You have the right to think false thoughts and thoughts that do not make sense. You have the right to think whatever you please. Your actions and spoken or written words matter, that is all.

I am not sure how we can find one another, but when it comes to bioethics, it is important to include patients in medical decision making to the greatest extent possible and it is especially important for our doctors to speak on our behalves if they think that we all or some of us should not have this implant. We should be included in the discussion and decision making, especially if we are competent and/or high functioning.

I don't think I am alone in this kind of thinking. There are probably many doctors who might agree with some things I suggest, so I don' think this is a 'doctors against patients' issue. I don't think parents are open to discussing the implant, but you can ask. If doctors suggested to parents that they could open up the dialogue, this might bring more truth to the table.

*mod edit*

Many of us have this device, so you're not alone.