I'd like to go ahead and state that I have unrightfully stolen some mannerisms which Eric_Lee portrays. One being the use of arrows to empathize a point. I hope that I will not get sued for Intellectual Property Theft. Thank you.
What I'd like to write about is the absurd. I wrote a lengthy essay for 8th grade explaining my interpretation of the meaning of life and my reaction to the philosophical implications of nihilism. My reaction was, basically, a LOLWUT of sorts. That is to say, I thought all solutions to the question was erroneous. Stupid, if you will.
As it's blatantly obvious, I promote nihilism. In fact, I do so almost dogmatically. But, one must realize the immense research that I engaged in out of boredom and simultaneous enthusiasm. It is very easy to argue for or against the purpose of life and whether or not there is a meaning to life. The debate (and the conclusions) depend entirely on semantics; an ironic state of affairs, that meaning of something so important would come down to something so seemingly trivial, no? If one defines meaning to be an objective reason to exist, a specific personal reason (purpose), then nihilism logically follows. However, if one defines meaning to be a subjective ideal which one may construe for themselves, then. . . Unless you're mentally handicapped, existentialism follows. (You know, because that's essentially the very ideal behind existentialism).
The reason that I wish to view the "meaning of life" as an objective purpose is that it is completely inane to not do so. It is blaringly obvious that one may create a meaning for their life but I find that this is masturbatory. It is masturbatory solely because it is just a psychological gratification mechanism. Indeed, the creation of a "meaning of life" using your psyche, to me, is nothing more than masturbating mentally; pleasuring yourself with notions you are fully aware are nothing more than . . . Exactly what they are.

Albert Camus brings up an annoyingly obvious reality to this entire discussion. Absurd. The absurd. . . sucks. More or less. Loosely speaking, the absurd is the kick-you-in-the-face question, "What the ###$ do I do if there's no meaning?!" I prefer to not mentally masturbate to poetic conceptualizations of it and simply state it as it is. It is simply a distressing question that worries one's psyche.
And this brings me back to my essay. In my essay, I ended on this conclusion: The question why does not have an answer. While it is certainly obvious that there is no true meaning to life (as defined by non-existential standards), the actual question of "Why do I continue to exist?" has no formal solution. It is an equation which is either beyond our comprehension or simply unanswerable.