My Steve9 argument self-test on degraded human intelligence.

I oppose young children going to school at too earlier an age, children forced by teachers to take school academic studying seriously. Children should have developed increased maturity and fairly reduced emotional self-programming chemical stimulations. Emotional self-programming is ideal for physical movement and fear fight and flight awareness. Children should find entertainment in experiencing intelligent interests rather than extreme chemical stimulation. Extreme chemical stimulation is misappropriated behaviour that leads human behavioural pathways down unsatisfied long term life styles. I would not think myself wrong by saying, "chemical imbalance leads humans into mental depression, mental illness bipolar psychotic behaviours and chemical substance dependence".

To demonstrate my above statement to why school education does what school education tries to achieve, I ask you to read the below reading with an open minded opinion, not to be influenced by biased emotionally driven self-esteem rewards which may support opinions about your own intelligence, delusional or otherwise. In other words, “don't be in such a hurry to judge true or false to experience knee-jerk reaction rewarding stimuli”. Which I say is predominately brought on by years of bad school education.

Movie: Apollo 13, starring Tom Hanks has one big obvious discrepancy about Apollo 13 spacecraft module's internal temperature once voltage power was reduced.

Most people are technically ignorant, and are very happy to be technically ignorant. Have no curiosity for understanding technical information.

I have stated previously that I don't believe a man has set foot on the moon. Placing that statement aside, there are several technical problems the media have brought to listeners attention which I say many people capable to think technical thoughts, such people can wonder why statements don't make sense:

(1) In the Apollo 13, Tom Hanks movie, and what may have been reported by early 1970s media during what supposedly happened during the Apollo 13 mission. In the movie, when Apollo 13 spacecraft modules' many voltage powered items were turned off, after voltage powered heat was turned off, Apollo 13 movie astronauts actors were getting colder, seen exhaling frosty breath.
I say, spacecraft modules exposed to the sun's ray radiation 24 hours a day for several days while spacecraft modules were travelling to the moon, modules would have been heating up, that cooling spacecraft modules would have been a big problem. Modules travelling in a vacuum of space made modules surfaces difficult to dissipate heat into a vacuum of space. The best defence against such sun ray radiation heating influences are by reflecting sun ray radiation and a distance using space's own vacuum between a reflecting surface and spacecraft module walls. Both practical innovations are noticeably least apparent/missing on Apollo mission modules.

After Apollo missions ended, a Satin 5 rocket fuel tank was deployed into earth's orbit, to be used as Space Lab. The fuel tank construction while in earth's orbit, spending only 40% of the time exposed the sun ray radiation, fuel tank walls failed to provide appropriate insulation from the sun's rays. Once discovered that inside Space Lab was heating up, an umbrella made of reflecting material was constructed and transported to Space Lab to be opened up between the sun's heating rays and the Space Lab.

If Apollo missions happened as stated, NASA would have been well experienced to have predicted the outcome of placing a Satin 5 rocket fuel tank into space to be used as Space Lab.

(2) Landing modules sitting on landing-pods on the moon, on leaving moon surface, a sudden explosion sees landing modules suddenly propelled into space. Orbiting modules are travelling at 3,000 mph in the moons orbit, 60 miles above the moon's surface, is a long distance for landing modules to travel to dock with orbiting modules. Landing modules speeding up from one earth month equals one moon day speeds to 3,000 mph orbiting module speeds. The moon is one sixth the gravity of earth. The amount of effort rock engine exhaust thrusting power takes to obtain the optimum speed to enter and maintain earth's orbit, I could assume one sixth the effort of rocket engine exhaust thrust to that of earth would be needed for landing modules coming from the moon to enter and maintain the moons orbit at the projected time orbiting modules are in approximate location. The sudden blast to send landing modules into moon's orbit is ridiculous. To propel heavy objects using a short duration explosion, propelled objects need to be in a tube like chamber so objects can speed up gradually to the calculated correct speed. Cannon barrels are propelling chambers. Even fireworks use barrel like chambers to send up fireworks into the sky.
I also wonder as Apollo landing modules were seen launched off landing-pods, a spray of reflecting foil was seen, seemingly giving added visual indications of an explosion while in a soundless travelling vacuum.

(3) The moon has no atmosphere for rocket engine exhausts to push against as on earth has an atmosphere for rocket engine exhausts to push against. Therefore slowly landing rockets on the moon and taking off from the moon influenced by one sixth gravity to that of earth under rocket propulsion with moon's zero atmosphere may be impossible.

(4) Rocket engine exhaust from the rear/bottom end propelled spacecraft are tall and narrow for reasons. Rockets pushing from the rear/bottom are balancing the direction spacecraft are intending to travel. Rocket engines pivot pushing bottom end section correcting falling top section of spacecraft in prescribed directions, keeping spacecraft upright and/or travelling in the correct direction. Apollo mission landing modules would be difficult to land on gravity influenced surface as the moon. Balancing box dimension spacecraft would be difficult to impossible to quickly pilot falling over/travelling towards the incorrect direction spacecraft, as had been proven to fail on 5 events on earth in similar experimental landing box module craft tests.

(5) Sun rays radiation heats up the moon surface to 125C during moon daylight hours. Even though the moon has no atmosphere the moon surface reflects sun rays back at astronaut space suits. The heat building up on landing modules and astronaut spacesuits, accumulated heat would need to be conveyed elsewhere. Even astronauts 36C body heat, held in confined suits on earth, heat would build up. On investigating how spacesuits reduce heat, Internet search results said “tubes convey water around the body, passing water through ice held in spacesuit backpacks”. Astronaut spacesuits reflect 90% of the suns heat ray radiation, leaving 10% of the sun's 125C surface temperature rays radiation to work the heat through spacesuit materials to enter inside spacesuits, added to astronauts own accumulating body heat. Apollo 11 astronauts spent 2 hours on the moon, Apollo 17 astronauts spent 3 days on the moon's surface. Apollo 17 astronauts went for a 2 hour buggy ride all the time exposed to the sun's rays.

(6) An often shown video captured scene where a landing module having left the moon, approaches an orbiting module. The landing module rotates rather quickly, then suddenly stops rotating, ready to move towards the orbiting module to dock. In all the rotating; disembarking; landing on the moon's surface, I have watched many scenes many time, I have not seen any rock engine fired or not unfired exhausts coming from landing modules. One “Apollo 17 Hoax exposed” Youtube attachment shows a landing module sitting on its landing pod/stand. A blast sees the landing module taking off. The camera taking video images, eventually pans upwards, sending images back to earth, camera aimed up at the Apollo 17 landing module to show a fired up rocket exhaust. On other landings where landing modules take off after an explosion, the landing module main rocket is still attached to the landing-pod/stand. Hence why I assume the Youtube Apollo 17 is called hoax exposed. A following Youtube shows further ideas mentioning Stanley Kubrick.
Stanley Kubrick “A Space Odyssey 2001” 1968 movie has many scenes where things, including spacecraft floating in space, yet I from my memories, there are no fired up rocket exhausts to be seen. Stanley Kubrick couldn't create good believable rocket exhaust scenes, therefore Apollo missions show no rocket exhaust scenes.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/how-nasa-capture ... 1671650186
To watch the attachment place video at 30 minutes 40 seconds.
I suggest, many drawn out, poorly presented Internet hoax theories are created and presented to encourage people not to believe hoax theories are true. Poor convincing evidence shadows on pictures discourages caring.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlGis35Epvs

(7) The Australian movie “The Dish” suggests dish technical staff including the US technician sent to oversee the Apollo 11 mission, lied to Huston several times to cover up a failed to start fuel driven electrical generator during a power blackout. Technicians do not lie at any time to cover up problems. If in real life, I assume, once lies were exposed, technicians would never work for any government project ever again. Wouldn't even be allowed to sweep floors.

(8) Watching Apollo mission moon surface images, relative to camera light exposure settings, no stars can be seen in the background. A quick 2016 television advertisement showing an astronaut what seems to be standing on the moon, shows bright stars in the background. I conclude the commercial picture is fake, pointing out to people who know, that stars in the background on Apollo missions were missing.

(9) As Apollo 11 landing module landed on the moon's surface, a camera view of the landing module's main rocket exhaust was seen blowing small amounts of dust away from the bottom of the Apollo 11 landing module. The assumed landing module weight to moon's one sixth gravity to that of earth and rocket engine exhaust slowly bringing down the landing module, I speculate the landing module was landing on solid rock. That the ground had almost no dust being blown away by Apollo 11 landing module rocket from below the landing module. That no hot fired up exhaust was seen to that of sun light as Apollo 11 landing module was landing on the moon.
As astronauts were hopping on the moon's surface, considerable dust could be seen propelled forwards. Kicked up dust looks darker than moon surface whiter shade. That astronaut foot prints indicated moon dust. That Apollo 17 buggy rides indicates significant moon dust.

(10) Apollo 11 astronauts on landing on the moon's surface, indicated that only 17 seconds of rocket fuel remained. As there was no rocket fuel refuelling station on the moon, how could Apollo landing modules take off from the moon's surface, speed up to orbiting modules travelling at 3,000 mph, 60 miles about the moon's surface, in zero atmosphere to aid exhaust thrust ascending conditions.

(11) An Apollo mission supposedly left four small reflector panels on the moon. I state these four reflector panels if they were on the moon would not work as stated. What has been shown on earth to be a laser light shining on the moon is seen as little more than a second world war search light. The moon is 240,000 miles from earth. The supposed laser light would need to pass through 50 mile of earth's atmosphere, light being attenuated into almost nothing by the time light entered space. The four panels that are merely sitting on the moon's surface are no larger than 400mm square (see foot prints close by) and have no actual mirror surface on either side of the transparent material panels. The idea that poorly reflected light could return back to earth passing through 50 miles of atmosphere from such small merely sitting on the surface of the moon panels: is ridiculous; is ridiculous; is ridiculous. Such ideas go with receiving radio wave sent pictures from Pluto, 7.5 billion miles from earth.
http://www.moonlandinghoax.org/8.html
I still do not believe Mythbusters are telling the truth, that being if the truth was no man landed on the moon, 47 years of serious media lies would be exposed.

I say the difficulties of landing a man on the moon and safely returning that man back to earth are so enormous, no person has landed on the moon's surface.
President Kennedy merely expressed without consultation with limited knowledge in rocket science scientists a desire to send a man to the moon before the decade ended. As landing a man on the moon were assumed couldn't be done, the entire moon landing was faked.

I strongly suggest the above mentioned problems on landing on the moon should cast strong doubt on whether astronauts actually set foot on the moon.
I strongly suggest whether astronauts did or didn't is important in that if astronauts didn't land on the moon, people in the know are enjoying a good joke at badly educated citizenry's expense. And that school education is intentionally making citizens technically ignorant. That prime ministers who encourage innovations are also enjoying a laugh at citizenry whom believe what they're told whether by direct statement and/or made up propaganda stories.

Engineers and scientists in need of establishment corporate and government financial support to carry out a living, being aware of the no man has landed on the moon, are not going to publicly state “no man has landed on the moon” in fear of having financial support refused. The media are also not going to convincingly state no man has landed on the moon for similar reasons. That Internet posted Apollo mission hoax theories are intentionally made to appear poorly thought out unconvincing evidence, discouraging people from taking any notice of well thought out theories.

The truth is important to know in order to mature realisation on whether governments and market forces manipulations are merely tricking citizens to believe faked information in order to manipulate citizens.
Citizens pride in believing society is scientifically moving forwards, such citizenry will endure increased hardship, much the same as church congregations donate what money they can afford to give towards church buildings and charities merely because religious believers believe in the honesty and good deeds priests and ministers state they provide.

Citizens need to know whether DNA taken from 30 years ago cold case dead body bones (as reported by Australian Catalyst science on October 4, 2016 program) can provide real evidence on stated knowledge or are citizens merely feed faked difficult to prove doubtful stories keeping citizens confidence in false capitalism, false democracies and false courtroom justice?

In 1969, I witnessed the Apollo 11 moon landing. I felt no emotional stimulation at the time. Years later when media comments stated that many people believed no man had set foot on the moon, I was not making any doubting conclusions either way. When time and technical realisations lead me to believe, landing spacecraft on the moon was doubtful, than to have information stated by NASA astronauts during “When We Left Earth” series. I spent time formulating argumentative technical evidence.

I occasionally try to bring to listeners and readers attention my theories on why no person has set foot on the moon. Listeners don't care, can't focus their attention to listen and/or see any reason to feel they have been mislead by media. Many people live in a world of their own making guided by how they feel.

November 14, 2016. News media states school educators are planning to teach very young children second languages beginning next year. My assertions that education departments are sabotaging children intelligence, holding children's intelligence in an emotional state causing long term psychological damage, learning second languages to children capable of doing so reduces capable children's time spent on calm restful rational thought.

History documentaries suggest, more than a thousand years of religious doctrine before the age of enlightenment began, predominate church buildings, priests constantly getting in front of human faces, I assume starting at children's early ages. Children who could have had time spent on calm consideration learning everyday experiences, priests redirect learning experiences towards zero real benefit to everyday life religious fantasies of an afterlife hell and heaven. Children may have been encouraged to spend spare time attending church religious ceremonies which children could have used time to realise life. Church priests and nuns telling stories to children about praying to god, Jesus and many saints. Once life's problems and fears of death are felt solved by religious devotion, children continue to do what feels fewer fears. The earlier children find thoughts hijacked by religious doctrine I assert the dumber behavioural pathways children hold themselves within.

To me the comparisons to religious doctrines and children's guided devotion to controlled curriculum school work studying are very similar. Being that many people believe similar concepts, that there exists explainable reasons, that most media rolled over topical explanations are merely misleading noise... few people can take the time to believe better conceptual pathways improve life.

I, with my absolute refusal to partake in my childhood school work studying, leaving school as soon as legally possible. I make no judgement on whether information is true or false merely because: media; religious authority; scientists; politicians; bank managers... quotes supposed facts. It is calm consideration to think whether stated sentences have real truth or are deliberate lies. That school education forces instinctive emotional reactions to believe information which feels understood, which feels true, must be true. That everything expressed to children has true merit. That I say school education actually stops children from rationally determining over years of school lessons what intelligent thought pathways are.

Whether a man landed on the moon is deemed important to you or not, readers so very busy with other right now concerns. The concern that all efforts leading to long term rewards should allow whether man walked on the moon is true, will aid determining whether future economic declines were merely some planned lie. That in order to manage long term mental health, take what you believe, and place yourself on calmer pathways, after having been expressed to you another readers (no diagnosed with mental illnesses) alternative intellectual reasoning.

Most sufferers of anxiety led behaviours may determine my above reading doesn't help. I suggest what human behaviours need are alternative beliefs, redirecting thoughts, experienced conclusions rather than childish self-medicating impulsive imaginations.
Worrying depression anxiety maybe more to do with old memories built up with emotional mental stress memory attachments, mental stress returns with worrying concerns. The fact that you as a reader have read down this far, may conclude, you find value in the above reading, the above reading being more interesting than stimulating fantasy rewards.

Another point is that I aim to bring to readers attention, not to simply force onto your children whatever education providers recommend to your children. Once children place themselves on poor behavioural pathways, all gains indicated by examination grades maybe short lived as built up stress reduces children's ability to mature intelligent reasoning as I have suggested in previous readings.

The Apollo mission no man walked on the moon object reading, was to demonstrate the lack of technical analysing productive thought humans can't realise is missing from their own awareness. That many mental illnesses self-awareness issues are left unrealised for the same reasons educated people can't bring themselves to analyse why no man has walked on the moon.

If by understanding how true human intelligence can analyse whether information is truly true or false, leaders have formulated reasons why children must attend school and/or home school devoted to prescribed curriculum examination school education.

As religion once encouraged parents to instruct their children on religious matters, redirecting young children's awareness onto pointless religion. Modern media children's television programs I speculate do much the same as religions by carefully distracting young children from intelligent thought productive information. Children's programs have a degree of Apocalyptic good verse evil war in the heavens story themes, I assume attract children towards behaviours as children age into adults.

I wouldn't be surprised if all those hours, upon hours, upon hours of sitting around and being bored to death at school caused me to develop ADHD. My dad does have ADD though so it could be inherited. Or perhaps it was inherited, and the factory- oops, I mean school exacerbated it.

I am glad, though, that my mom and dad were both non-religious, as am I. I think it anchors the mind from free-thinking, which is an important factor in humanity's progression. Not that that's always the case, nor am I saying I hold theists' beliefs against them for being religious. But I prefer to be unaligned.

“G' Forces” experienced by human bodies on blasting off from the moon.

Less the 24 hours after posting my steve9 above reading, a thought came to me prompted by a memory on how when launching rockets exampling Satin 5, a narrator said rockets could accelerate faster during launching except for the “G” forces, blood and body organs not wanting to accelerate faster than body parts held in seats. Sudden acceleration can kill astronauts. Watch 3 minutes into the Youtube stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlGis35Epvs

I theorise, as Stanley Kubrick was unable to film what looks credible to watch rocket engine exhausts while launching Apollo landing modules off the moon's surface, providing a good looking credible rocket launch for audiences to see. Instead using an explosion to propel landing modules upwards was used.
Remembering there are two astronauts held inside landing modules, after seeing the sudden propelled upward landing module, I add to other theories there were no astronauts within what was said to be landing modules.

Astronauts supposedly brought back from the moon 109 pounds of moon rocks. Two men plus 109 pounds of moon rocks. Landing module mass suddenly moved upwards on an explosion. A single explosion sent a perfectly balanced landing module placed above an explosive charge so as the charge exploded, landing module wouldn't merely spin off to the side, even if the module mass had time to speed up while under the influence of one sixth moon gravity.

I have seen the mentioned image many years ago, that as the landing module was propelled upwards, no rocket engine at the bottom of the landing module was present, the rocket engine was still attached to the landing module pod/stand. That after the camera panned upwards to see a landing module continue to be moving upwards, I can't remember if there was a fired up rocket. Because I do remember the landing module rocket was still on the landing pod/stand, I would have remembered questioning why was there a fired up rocket pushing up landing modules after the explosive charge sent landing modules upwards.

I tend to believe as this explosion scene rather than rocket engine exhaust launching landing modules upwards from the moon, was questioned on how landing modules reached orbiting modules 60 miles above the moon surface, travelling at 3,000 mph. That fired up rocket light was added later as stated theories were exposing a fake moon landing module launch.

My summery is: explosions would have left heavy mass landing modules sitting on the landing pod/stands. If landing modules launched upwards as seen, all astronauts would have died as there bodies could not have lived through the sudden acceleration. One central explosion or many explosions spread over an area between the landing module and pod/stand, exploding at one moment below a heavy unbalanced mass would have not seen landing module rise upwards as perfectly as what was seen.

….............word association theory..............

Here's another theory relating to psychology and technical information:
I am not associated with establishment and/or established book publishers. I try to type out my readings as best as I can within reason, to allow readers to read what could be considered complex detailed readings.

I find when attempting to read reading material that suggests something of value within reading material is worth while reading, I often find myself reading vague readings, barely coming to worthwhile complete conclusions. The more relevance that could be gained the more babble can be read.

I blame this avoiding relevance to worthy to know information, on books financed by the establishment. Hence reading books can be bad for readers intelligence. Once immature readers find confusion, further reading is believed futile.
Reading: fantasy; murder stories; wild life; adventure stories; stated as true stories; history stories. The resemblance to old European fairy tales and religious stories, controlling readers thoughts I suggest has similar intentions.

There's an idea where word association prompts ideas into listeners conscious awareness. A psychologist mentions a word, having previously asked listeners to express what was the first thought that came to mind.
I pose the establishment is controlling the first thoughts that come to people's minds, using non-technical information.
All: media entertainment and commentary; books; picture images are guiding collective populations away from technical thoughts. That read and spoken sentences often lead thought productive ideas away from what could be wage paying employment technically useful information.

I assume, because myself, beginning as a young child thereabouts 1960s through to late teenager years, particularly on weekends, I would lie on my bed, looking up towards the white ceiling... spending time thinking of whatever came to mind, not listening to music. Not that there were that much to think about. I was not being influenced by books nor spoken sound media.

At this period during 1960s transistor technology was not very advanced, yet I eventually started buying relevant components and building valve sound amplifiers. If there's a point, calm thought steadies the mind for when real worth while learning can be correctly memorised and that no pointless cultural distractions and noise interrupts word and thought association bringing memories to conscious awareness.

I suggest, script writers, producers and directors of children's programs through to adult programming are well aware of the word association theory, constantly attempting to attract and hold listeners attention towards various forms of controlled information: religion; music culture; comedy programs; sports; Hollywood movies.

My early childhood years of limited media programming and time spent in calm solitude without being influenced by parents reading children's books and child playing fantasy toys, my neuron connection pathways were least influenced by distracting knee-jerk reaction stimuli.

I do not believe I am brilliant, nor do I promote brilliant thoughts, I am attempting to say most people are being prevented from finding their own truly brilliant thoughts, by being messed up by their attention to how they feel about relevant information after having gone through a punishing pretend school education, that their misplaced beliefs that school education is their primary pathway to intellectual and financial success.