Casinos and Duty of Care? From the Guardian.com

Interesting story from the Guardian newspaper in the UK, Sat 16th August 2014. You really have to wonder why stronger measures aren't taken when a gambler is clearly displaying compulsive behaviour. Would an alcoholic have been allowed to continue along these lines I wonder?
...........
The Ritz casino has won a court battle to recover £1m from a wealthy gambling addict who failed to pay money she owed.

Noora Abdullah Mahawish Al-Daher, who is married to the foreign minister of Oman, lost £2m in the London casino during an evening of gambling but only paid half of the debt, leading to the high court dispute.

Cheques which she signed on the evening of 3 April 2012 in return for gambling chips were dishonoured, the court heard. A few months later, she and her family gambled away £3m ($5m) in Las Vegas.

Mrs Al-Daher, who is known to western acquaintances as Nora, argued that the casino had been "under a duty of care" towards her as its staff knew she was a gambling addict or problem gambler and should have restrained her from betting.

A claim by the Ritz had been based on "illegality" and the unlawful giving of credit, she claimed.

Her lawyers argued that signs of her addiction were apparent both through how much she gambled in the period leading up to that evening, on the evening itself, and by what she said.

High court deputy judge Seys Llewellyn QC ruled there was no legal authority that supported her case and gave judgment to the casino "in the sum of £1m, as claimed", plus interest.

"I hold that there was no unlawful giving of credit to Mrs Al-Daher," he said.

On the question of a duty of care, he said: "In my judgment authority does not support such a duty."

The judge said he had no doubt that, if Mrs Al-Daher had been refused permission to carry on gambling at the Ritz casino, she "would have been eager and inclined to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very probably during her stay in London during the days or weeks after 3 April 2012".

"It is striking that she and her family gambled away $5m in Las Vegas in June some two to three months later," he said.

Mrs Al-Daher is married to Oman's foreign minister Sayyid Badr bin Hamad bin Hamood Al-Busaidi. The judge described her as "a woman of great wealth". He said it came from family funds in Saudi Arabia from her late father, whilst her husband was wealthy in his own right from business interests in Oman and through a Saudi Arabian conglomerate.

Judge Llewellyn rejected Mrs Al-Daher's counter-claim to recover the £1m of her debt she had paid in December 2012.

On the evening she lost the £2m she had signed and given individual cheques for £200,000 and £300,000 in return for gambling chips.

The judge said it had been her habit to sign cheques to the casino for such sums, but the cheques signed that evening were dishonoured.

In December 2012 she paid £1m to the casino but left £1m outstanding and it was that amount the casino was entitled to recover.

It is hard to fathom how people who are super rich, rich enough to have whatever their hearts' desire, feel compelled to gamble for even more money.

How sad that money, which could really help so many, is treated so cavalierly.

True, but it also shows that this affliction affects rich and poor alike. I still think more can be done. If a bar was to continue to serve alcohol to someone who had clearly too much to drink already they would be reprimanded. Casinos are ultimately money making machines who have no duty of care, another compelling reason to stay away!

It's never enough wrote: I still think more can be done. If a bar was to continue to serve alcohol to someone who had clearly too much to drink already they would be reprimanded. Casinos are ultimately money making machines who have no duty of care, another compelling reason to stay away!

Right. There are laws about curtailing liquor sales at certain times and on certain days. Yet casinos stay open all night. At the very minimum, if states and the casino are truly concerned about curtailing problem gambling, the casinos should have to close from say 3 or 4 a.m to 7 or 8 a.m., to give the gambler who is "on tilt," trying to chase his/her losses, room to breath and think.

Also, casinos should not be allowed to loan money to gamblers to gamble with.

More needs to be done regarding the access to credit. A friend of mine recently was offered "credit" by a casino after he had maxed out his card, luckily he was sensible enough to decline it but I hate to consider what the consequences may have been had he chosen to accept this. One can only imagine that we are talking loan shark rate territory and once you are in the pocket of these crooks how the hell would you ever get out?