boopsy26 wrote:Tylas, I want to respond briefly to your question without hijacking this thread. But it is important to the original question at hand as well.
Yeah, let's move it to a new one.
Johnny-Jack wrote: Johnny-Jack wrote: DDNOS (dissociative disorder - not otherwise specified), a dissociative disorder diagnosis for a condition like dissociative identity disorder (DID) but with ego states rather than alters...
tylas wrote:I was hoping someone else would address this so I don't have to. I am confused. My thinking was that DDNOS-1 and DID both have alters, but there is less of a dissociative boundary between the Alters in DDNOS-1. The time loss happens when there are two or more Apparently Normal Parts, which is absent in DDNOS-1 because there is always just one Apparently Normal Part, but there can be numerous emotional parts.
What you wrote JJ makes sense in that the dissociative boundary causes Alters and thus DID, but ... I am not sure alters are exclusive to DID. Could someone straighten me out please?
Now Complex PTSD is different. I think this is where you find ego states - but I am not sure. I never thought of it as you wrote it before JJ.
Am I wrong?
More
"A person who felt she had alternate personalities but in whom those personalities were not fully developed or autonomous or who was always the personality in control might be diagnosed DDNOS, as might someone who suffered depersonalization episodes but not of the length and severity required for diagnosis"
http://www.palace.net/llama/psych/diag.html
DDNOS-1
Symptoms: Dissociated and compartmentalized parts, but the major hallmark symptoms of DID such as current time loss are not present. This means time loss in a present day, not an inability to remember childhood. In some cases this can actually be harder to treat than DID.
Etiology: Similar to DID etiology
Structural Dissociation: 1 ANP and 2 or more EP
More info..
http://dx-dissociative-identity-disorde ... ative.html
This is a great description of DID Etiology:
Merek Manual - "Children are not born with a sense of a unified identity; it develops from many sources and experiences. In overwhelmed children, many parts of what should have blended together remain separate. Chronic and severe abuse (physical, sexual, or emotional) and neglect during childhood are frequently reported by and documented in patients with dissociative identity disorder. Some patients have not been abused but have experienced an important early loss (such as death of a parent), serious medical illness, or other overwhelmingly stressful events. In contrast to most children who achieve cohesive, complex appreciation of themselves and others, severely mistreated children may go through phases in which different perceptions, memories, and emotions of their life experiences are kept segregated. Such children may over time develop an increasing ability to escape the mistreatment by “going away” or retreating into their own mind. Each developmental phase or traumatic experience may be used to generate a different self-state."
boopsy26 wrote:All the terms of "ego states" "ANP's" "hosts", etc. are all conceptualized theories that are not actually tangible things. As much as alters may feel like real people, they are, in actually, still part of one person. I think most of us can agree on that. These concepts are based on different scientists and patients' perceptions of a phenomenon that is nearly impossible to accurately describe. There is not enough hard research out there to definitively decipher any true hard line between PTSD, Complex PTSD, BPD, DDNOS, DID, and often times Schizophrenia (psychosis and loss of reality can occur with any of these disorders and are quite common). These are all on a similar continuum with many overlapping experiences that most often are based in trauma, extreme stress, and early loss. Getting so hung up on the specifics will certainly cause confusion and might drive a person bonkers, because so much of this is not hard science and is not actually conceptualized well. The different terms are often used differently by different people. Much of the research I have read considers all alters to be ego states that are just further dissociated from awareness than in the normal person. Personally, I find this to make the most sense, especially once you get into the neuroscience of it.
I fully expect and look forward to a rebuttal by Una on this one...
Yeah, I know all that Boopsy and totally agree with you about these dissociative disorders being on a continuum and I agree that Alters are ego states with more defined boundaries, but they have some other important differences as well.
I like (NO NEED) to get hung up on specifics. Not being organized drives me insane. I must do it. That does not mean others have to, but I need to know. Call it OCD or whatever, but I must dig to the bottom of things, organize them and make sense of them. I drive my LC nuts doing this too! The thing is that it's all starting to make such perfect sense to me and my alters. I bet it does to those like van der Hart, Steele, etc... as well. I want to learn more. I don't think that is bad and don't expect everyone to have this desire at all!
Still the question remains are those Ego States or Alters in DDNOS-1. There is a difference.
There is a rather hard line between PTSD and Complex Dissociative Disorders. Why do you say there is not?