nora1990 wrote:Sorry you're going through this.

I totally understand, a similar thing happened to me and I felt the same. It's hard to explain it without people brushing it off as attention seeking or you wanting to have BPD itself for some reason, rather than wanting a diagnosis.
I can see why doctors avoid it because of the stigma, not wanting to label people, etc, but I don't really think it's their right to decide whether that's the right thing for everyone or not. There's loads of reasons for preferring to have a diagnosis and it does feel like they're trivializing your problems if they take it away.
I suppose it's not for me to say since I'm not a professional, but I'd guess that the doctor is probably just reluctant to keep the diagnosis floating around. I'm sure it'd be wrong on their part if it was about you not having substance abuse issues or not being promiscuous... there's plenty of people with BPD who don't have those traits. Not to mention there's other impulsive/self-damaging behaviours that are equivalent to those and you don't need to meet all of the criteria anyway.
I really hope you manage to work this out, it's a horrible feeling and isn't invalid at all. Fingers crossed for you.
Nora
Thank you, Nora. I agree with your guesstimate there, that the doctor simply does not want to have diagnoses so much at play as he (and others working with me towards recovery) want to have the best options available for treatment. As he explained to me, my issues are primarily behavioral, not chemical, in these regards. As a result, he followed through what he believed was the best approach, in that I seek opportunities of mindfulness, slow my impulses, take a couple medications to help ease what he called my "anxious energy", and work through DBT skills. The day I was discharged, he even made mention how it probably feels I am being abandoned by them
(ding, ding, ding...) but that in getting out in reality, I would become more established
in reality again.
To that, I can agree. And I agree that I'm definitely on the Borderline spectrum and have been for many years, it's just that now I've had the diagnosis itself taken away and replaced with something that's - in my eyes - lesser.
That's not to make light of anyone with PDNOS, just that I had the full diagnosis, and right now I feel my symptoms are worse now than they were six months ago, so I'm confused as to reasons behind taking the diagnosis away.
Like, I understand the over-identifying of it, and I've had times where I've slipped into saying things in regards to "I'm Borderline" rather than "I have Borderline", but as an overall I do understand that it is not my identity. It's just the closest thing to sense I have right now.
gratteciel wrote:I understand how you feel. When I got BPD, it made SO much sense. I felt like I fit somewhere. I felt like I had a plan for once, and I could have specified treatment instead of "oh, let's do this...oh wait, no, this...well, that didn't work..., etc."
Really, what I think it comes down to, is the doctor/therapist. People perceive things differently. My first therapist noted my file as depression with access to borderline personality disorder. (I have traits, in other words.) But he never told me about the BPD part, at least not right away. Then another therapist told me I the disorder, not just traits of it. Then one psychiatrist told me I had mood disorder NOS with traits of BPD. Then my current psychiatrist, who gave me the best evidence based on my behavior, said BP II. You can ask ten different people, and you might get the same answer a couple of times, and you might get a bunch of random answers. You just never know.
What's important is this: Who has the best treatment plan in place for you? Who can help you succeed? My psychiatrist told me I'm BP II, which shocked and scared me, but he also has the best idea of what meds will help me. Whether or not I have the actual chemical imbalance that causes bipolar disorder, I don't know. But, like you said, it helped me understand my behavior and find direction in treatment.
When people ask why I see a psych, I do say, "I have bipolar disorder". But I NEVER say "I am bipolar." I'm NOT bipolar. I'm blonde. I'm tall. I'm spastic sometimes. I'm high-strung. I'm funny. I'm bitter, and I'm tired, and I'm unpredictable sometimes. But I am NOT bipolar. I live with bipolar disorder, I have bipolar disorder, I suffer from bipolar disorder, whatever. But I'm NOT bipolar.
Just as someone with cancer would not say "I am cancer" or someone with diabetes would not say "I am diabetes", you are NOT borderline, and you are NOT bipolar. I am a grammar/diction guru, and I even thought that the change of phrasing was absurd at first. Who cares? I'm bipolar versus I have bipolar disorder? Really? But I started saying it the way my therapist told me, and it's helped. Because I, too, was attached to my diagnoses - all of them - and I hated when someone came up with something new. But you do have to detach from it to a point, and realize that a diagnosis is meant to direct treatment, not change your identity.
It's okay and expected that you would be frustrated with people throwing around diagnoses like a baseball, but just try to focus on the treatment aspect of it. Also understand that bipolar and borderline get mixed up quite a bit. They're very, very close except people with bipolar do not necessarily have attachment/abandonment issues, and therefore don't have issues with splitting and all that. So, you might end up going back and forth each time you see a new doc.
Gratteciel, thank you! Your depth of response is truly appreciated. I agree that it helped having the diagnosis so I knew exactly where to go. I guess nothing has really changed in that regard, just that I struggle with that I obviously disagree with the doctor in that I feel my diagnosis really ought to still be Borderline when my symptoms now are worse than they were when I was first diagnosed.
As to identifying, "I am _____" versus "I have _____", this is something I have worked on quite a bit over the last few years. I always used to tell people I was a cutter back when I was in high school and even some in college. Now it's along the lines of "I struggle with self-injury." I've struggled with the labeling of it ("I'm so Borderline right now!") more of a light of explanation. But like I said to Nora, there are times when I slip and catch myself saying such things, even though I know a label is not my identity. That's why I have the quote in my signature. It's to always remind me of that.
Even now my family continues to call me a cutter. If it's between that and calling me Borderline, I'd prefer labeling the latter simply so it's taken as a collective whole of symptoms, not just the one. No,
I am not Borderline, just on the spectrum, in the very least. Ideally, no one would be labeling anything in that way. I might not know who I am, but I am not my mental illness; it is a part of me, but not all of me.
Now that I've started to settle a bit from the diagnoses themselves, I am working towards focus on the treatment. It's not that I don't care about the diagnoses, but regardless of what they are, my symptoms are said to be behavioral, maladaptive, and self-destructive. And I am said to be intelligent, which points all involved parties to believe that DBT will be effective for me as I take time to process through things and learn. I might be resistant to change, but I do truly want to make the effort for those changes to be made, as hard as it will be.
I agree that the diagnosis itself helps in finding what treatment is best to work with. I've heard it said that Borderline and Bipolar operate on the same spectrum, so it's understandable that they could be interchangeable in regards to what I'm going through. Ultimately, I just want to focus on getting the help I need so that I can later go back and help others, too.