The Jargon buster key..

Mirror intelligence whats that.
Well to very limited degree you've probably already used mirror intelligence.
Have you ever asked your search engine a question and clicked on a result linking to a questions and answer site.

Ok so dynamic object storage whats that.
Well lets start with object storage.
You're children deffinitly probably already use object storage on mostly a day to day basis every time their working with drop box or posting a picture or text on facebook the way that data is stored is in an object form as opposed to a file form this enables the service to set the object data attributes for efficient service. One simple example is facebook using the object form to better figure out posts that you might be interested in. If facebook worked only with original file formats that user data would be less efficient when face book want to efficiently share between interest groups posts.

Dynamic object storage now.
Your just adding the word dynamic to sound smart arent you lets compare the difference between a dynamic obeject and a standard object and see if theres anything in it shall we.

In your standard object your object is placed in the object field and key data and meta data is added to the data this all means you get one would hope your most desired posts from your 50000 friends at the top.

In a dynamic object relative to functions used on the object you can alter the object. along with key and meta data you also get customisability and in some cases reprogramability abilties for your now dynamic object.
One way too look at a dynamic object is from perspective of what such means for a consumer.
You might at first think the idea of coding an obeject everytime you post is a stupid idea that could never take off amongst the general public most people arent on face book to code their posts which would be fair. Lets look at the issue from another perspective your an artist of whatever art a shop an organisation or even just an app hording tablet user and your on your facebook app and you notice a new button called object apps. Out of pure curiosity and suprise at the thought of having apps inside an app you touch this new button thinking to your self what on earth is an object app. You are presented with a simple download shop with over 70 of these object apps 50 of them completly free. You notice one called flick and tell you down load your flick and tell app and run it your presented with a new posting interface in this object app you can put up to five pictures or txts into a customisable tabulation post you think neat you use it to express five different views people could have about a topic close to shall we say your heart to be pg. You toch post and post your first dynamic object although lets be frank to a very limited degree objects already are dynamic. Anyway wondering how this all might play out you go to your facebook main page and there it is your cool new post damn no ones responded yet no feedback you think. You have a looksy through your friends posts and dont find much that interesting and after a refresh no one has responded you casually flick through your new multipost and too your suprise on tab five a bunch of responses magically pop up below it turns out most people wanted to tell you what they thought of your fifth comment ahh deh thats how an object app works later you find a fashion post that allows you to dress a women differently with m&s s new range wow you say to yourself i must get myself more familier with these new facebook object apps and repost your best customisation. To you the consumer you niether care to know about dynamic objects and the stresses over at facebook hq over the issue all you know is that these new object apps are cool.
Funny enough my point of this post actually has nothing to do with new innovations at facebook I was just using facebook purly as an example of as to what dynamic object storage is about.

Ok moving on what are WCRFs.
Well its just what ive renamed my wide configuration function issue to i think the acronym widly configurable recompilable function is more accurate.
As to what one of these things are well lets start with a simple funtion lets be really simple lets say the function pause.
So you have your function in this case pause.
Lets say you type Pause(x) now in this case x is the number of seconds you want to pause you program for.
So thats a basic pause function lets move to a more general pause function.
Lets say this time with our general pause function we can also set the accuracy between normal and working more efficiently with absolute timming and x in this case is how many milliseconds we want our pause to pause for not merly seconds.
So we type into our console pause (500,timming=absolute).
This now means that our pause function trys to pause as accuratly as is possible for 0.5 seconds.
Ok lets go to even deeper configurability this time not only can we how long we want to pause for and what type of timming to use we can also set an interval rate by which to check our timming a kind of accuracy setting lets say.
So here we go lets use this in the console in some wierd undocumented way of using psudocode so we type Pause(300,timming=absolute(intervalaccuracy=14)) and enter so why am i doing this i know i know its not the nicest use of psudo code either but as you increase function ability and relative ability dynamic working with mearly a simple function call does incurr coding problems thats why c++ exsits right. Anyway who could possibly need such complexed pause functions and if they do whats wrong with c++ing the issue such a person needing a pause function so complex would surly work for a company that can afford a c++ man anyway having such a function for common use is pointless and processor intensive just what is your point hd man.
Well lets look a psudocode c like approach and my cool new WCRF approach and lets say our person who even need such ridiculusly advanced pauseability is none other than a physicist working on the latest laser guided atomic clock and this guy want super accuracy and this is not the only person who could be wanting such advanced pauseability either what about rocket science or improvements to mission control of that gps functionality all such people could benefit just from more dynamic recompilability of our lowly pause function and there are many other too just from WCRFing one function in this case pause.

So our psudo c like code.
Include absolute timming
Include normal timmng
Include pause
Include conditionals

Ploop(x , y , z )(
Integers x and z;
String y;
Pause (x, y, z) ++extend pause some how such that its able to do more advanced things;
Change some assembly time issues.
)
And dah dah your ready to compile
The atomic clock maker attempt one.
The compiler being localised well to your code goes for it probably ending you with a more efficient function than if youd asked java to bytecode and run that same functionality but quite possibly much could have still been avoided down at compile code especially if your final file is a windows dll or exe and just to achieve this well enough you needed a c++ programmer and every time you need to change the functionality of this function you either need to work with a more dynamic less efficient form or you need your programmer to recode for the sake of one function. Anyway youve taken your c++ route and things are going ok but your programer wants a pay rise and the guy above you is forcing your hand wanting you to change your programmer to a guy who can work cheaper not to mention how many pause loops youve ended up with trying to get a good optimal of functionality and compute time and you cant avoid the issue timming dynamics are mission critical for your new superduper atomic clock and as you utilise more functionality coding problems just keep getting worse and worse. Now with your new programmer hes trying to adapt his object orientated style to the current code and things are not pretty youve got other functionality to do with lazer control at precision timming and you end up having to add four more programmers to your team and the boss isnt happy the buget is going through the roof you need more technicians for the apperatus and you know its possible but the work load is mounting up your pride is on the line and because your working with new people issues are rising the technicians need to make improvements and its taking time to adapt to the code. 4 years late and 16 times the budget your team did improve over the issues over time and you have it a more accurate atomic clock a 5th as efficient as originally planed its ok though your from the eu and this sort of thing happens all the time and your burocratic heads hold the press briefing today the world has moved towards a new degree of precision say these burocrates like they have much of a clue wasting money like toilet paper accept if your some interesting fresh minded commoner that is year screw you burocratic nonsense men all your squandering will destroy you in the end as your competitors evolve to more progressive hights of efficiency and dynamic and you cry wolf for the uptenth time whist painting garbage nonsense unto the mind then shedding you tears in silence with the realisation that if you dissapered noone would miss you and just how much your not untouchable whilst you pop up your poker face pretending glory like the truth isnt a silent killer forcing your citizens to never be able to take a step back and enjoy the sound of silence. It must really offend you official researcher dude and especially you mr top brass brat that for all your squandering and blood money some little commoner youve attempted to kill subtly with every poison including the kitchen sink laughs at your attempt screws up your hench man causes your global warming technology not to work requires all five eyes every bit of them at once to pause his thoughts for a week and worst of all amidst all of this is becoming worth more than you to all your major industries more and more each day. Harrdy har. Anyway our atomic clock maker wonders what could have been improved to get closer to a better efficiency what we've achieved is better but only just.

So here we go onto WCRFs
A WCRF has three main modes normal, extended and recompile

And working with pause.

Normal mode

Pause (x) probably normal is milliseconds

Extended mode

Pause2 = Extend pause

Extensions

Absolute timming.
Extensions
Interval control.

Additional
Converge conditionional if equal too

Configure
Your way how the funtion is programmed.

Pause2(blah blah blar how ever youve personally decided its setting to be set)

Recompile mode

Pause3 = Recomp pause output WCRF c code and WCRF assembly code

Extensions

As above

Additional

As above

Limitations
Absolute timming degree half
Pause for given time set to 16bit
Condition depth
Max interval depth 20
ect ect ect

Configure
How ever you want your function to work

hit run and after a few moments theres you c and assembly code for use with you main program at the bottom

In the compiler it might work first from the limitation dynamics and then through the process convergently.


Ok so thats our jargon buster bit out who knows a light may have just lite up at gps hq and Havent finished yet.

Lets go right up to IBM labs 3 years from now as to what could be.
The development platform their working on
One that makes full use of
Neuro synaptic cellular ic arrays
Mirror intelligence
Wide configuration recompilable functions
And dynamic object storage

And why might IBM be doing this.
Well in this example IBM has from prior r and d plus some mental ghonas there moving away from basic txtual searching and general sensory intelligence in this case senario and their going for the big one and what a big one it is their working on a state of the art development and communications platform for those guys over at the large hadron collider.
They want to improve coputer efficiency.
Increase unification of work effort.
Better help detect and compile data of interest.
And yes work in an intelligent enough way that many theoretical mathemaitical issues can be assesed and even improved such that the overall theoretical model converges towards an optimal set of theories matching known data.

In order to achieve this our development platform has to work with our technicians and scientists such that every usful thought from our team is collected. Man this thing is listening to them at the dinner table its so bad. So we have our data dump where we work on code ever section of dumpable realtime scripting and function calling can be dumped and reconfigured and extended in reconfigurability. Every thing the group thinks can be noted relating to an object and every mathimatical symbol possible can be definied our little object attachment note arent just plain text and our AI is reading this stuff relating code play and most importantly keep the team in the loop without their mental contrabution this machine is pityfull.
We have a super facebook like system on the comms and many ai abilities are keeped to low use so it can get on with more important things than talking with the coolest sexiest voice ect.
Sensitive this machine is super sensitive it doesnt want to miss any important clues nor does it want to go on limitless wild goosechases. Years later the human team at cern and the machine intelligence should be so wrapped up in the work at hand that they really couldent give a flying toss whats discovering what as the issue is so relative its impossible to trace becuase they should be making so much progress by then no one cares the path just the interesting bits along the way and an optimal convergent path.

And yes abstract physics logic can work in WCRF form and be emensly useful to the machine intelligence when at ones virtual white board talking about certain theoretical physics issues regarding the latest find and dont forget the mind of the technician he can improve efficiency for the ai relative to such research ploting abstract logic functions as to improve the machines abilities as opposed to it all being plotted by the machine single ARMly. Simply having technicians re interpreting whats been said in the air by some researcher into txt can improve the machines ability to process those guys voices efficiently so it can knuckle down on more pressing relationship issues. All top efficiency angles when human minds can assist must be assesed and prioritised including adapting current data and systems. No good stone must be left unturned but you dont want to have to unturned all the stones to know which are the good ones.