shock_the_monkey wrote:consequently, after many failed attemps at being sociable i eventually retreated into my own world of interests. something i wish i'd been able to maintain.
I believe this (active interests) is something that can always be recovered. It's just hard when you have your focus on people, or when you're feeling down (or both at the same time — which is very easy to happen). I work on the premise that if I can adjust my "mental landscape" according to this principle (which I believe I can), then I can be able to enjoy my interests again.
------------------
chlov wrote:My mother says I've always shown some "peculiarities" ever since I was a little child, and she says I did very weird things as a child.
I have a hard time determining "how weird" I was as a child. Or how weird I still am, for that matter... People often seem to imply that I am the oddest person out of their acquaintances, even though I actively make efforts to "tone down" my eccentricity so I don't stand out
too much. (I really hate having to explain or justify the way I am or the little things I do, since I'll usually have no good explanation.) I guess this is (and has always been) one of my major deficits — I can't really grasp what's "normal" and what's not (hence my disproportionate self-consciousness and consequent anxiety).
That's not the same as gifted, since gifted people are supposed to be true geniuses.
Not really. People tend to be sensationalistic about it. I've even seen papers defining "giftedness" strictly in terms of an IQ of 120 or greater (IQ is a very limited measurement and a very poor reference). That's by definition "above average", but nothing extraordinary.
I believe "true geniuses" are so extremely rare that no school could afford to have special programs for the eventuality of ever having one of them among their students. I also really don't think academic achievement (or even a conspicuous potential for academic achievement) is either requirement for or proof of "genius". Only history can be.