I have quite a heated debate about homosexuality. The guy I'm debating with technically is not a homophobe. He accepts homosexuality is not a psychiatric disease, he supports equal rights for gays but he still insists homosexuality is a sexuality dysfunction because gays can not naturally procreate (so procreation function is kinda broken). The same way colour-blind people are totally okay socially-wise but their eyesight is pathological.
But this is not an old boring "they can not procreate so it's wrong" argument. He doesn't think bisexuality is a sexuality pathology as they can procreate (so he's pretty consistent in this regards). You can not argue that with a typical answer about child-free people as he is talking about a biological pathology, not social choice. Old people and infertile people (disease) also kinda support his point.
The best response I came to is that procreation is not a mandatory biological function for a human being. There're many beings in nature that are born not to procreate but to help for procreation (gay uncle hypothesis and increased amount of babies among gay person relatives fullfill this analogy).
Are there any better answers? Or is it fair to say homosexuality is a sexuality dysfunction? Have there been any scientists (psychiatrists?) who treated bisexuality as something normal and homosexuality as something dysfunctional (at a bilogical level)?