naps wrote:iwillsteal wrote:I think we all require interaction; without interaction, we cannot exist for long. In fact, without interaction, we cannot exist at all. Without interaction neglected, unstimulated, children in orphanages begin to rock repeatedly. Without interaction prisoners and victims of torture in solitary confinement slowly lose all perspective as to who or what they are. Studies have revealed their brains shrink. We may retreat; we may withdraw from others, we may have no desire to interact 'directly'; but we have the luxury of interacting 'indirectly'; a forum is one way. In the film 'Shadowlands' a student of C.S. Lewis, comes to answer the question posed by the author 'Why do we read'? He quotes his father; 'We read to know we are not alone''. We might say the same as to why we write...or why we listen to the music, or why we watch a drama unfold on our t.v. screens. The author Kafka after long periods of isolation in his room came to desire human interaction when his solitude became unbearable; 'on those days' he wrote 'I long for an arm...any arm...to bring me back into sway with the rythmn of humanity'. I am taking the words from memory; these are not accurate quotes. But my point is this; we may want to immerse ourselves in solitude; but sooner or later, we all come up for air. It is just a question of when.
I agree.
Would anyone care to define "interaction"?
I. Preferring interactions with animals over those with humans, my partner (I'm speaking for him because he dislikes online forums) might define an interaction as a positive, reciprocal exchange between living creatures.
When they feel secure, rabbits, birds, cats, dogs, foxes, and other animals (I saw an imgur video clip of a big orange fish accepting petting!) exhibit awareness, personality, even ego! Many times, I have had the distinct feeling that the
only thing preventing some of them from speaking human language was the structure of their mouths and vocal cords.
When displeased, instead of, "Say it with flowers.", they will, "Say it with urine or feces.". They can't give the finger because most don't have ones long enough. I wonder if anyone who has befriended an ape or monkey has taught them obscene hand gestures.
II. Then, there is the intra-/inter-human interaction. Involving the transmission of idea(s) even over great spatial (email, etc.) and temporal (works of art, music, architecture, books) expanse. The intra-human interaction might happen deliberately via a sealed letter to oneself in the future, or accidentally, seeing something one wrote years before and rediscovering a forgotten idea.
I think the key thing with any interaction (I or II) would be injecting something new into our mental habits. Something to cause a 'mutation' in our hermetically sealed mental domes.
HowlPendragon wrote: . . .
the ideal would be a direct that feels good.why is that so difficult to exist
Dunno, but when I have high expectations regarding a direct interaction, especially something I have visualized ahead of time, the more clearly I have visualized it, the more the real thing will bomb.