naps wrote:muaddib wrote:I noticed that, that most of the books you listed are music and artist biographies.
I read a lot of novels, too. Mostly crap.
Actually, I think that's perfectly ok. I think it's only when you don't realize it's crap that it becomes a problem. I remember a friend of mine telling me about how David Foster Wallace would deal with burnout by binge-watching really mindless TV shows for days at a time.
naps wrote:I am reasonably well versed in Poe, or was...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPHauoHNuQk (probably NSFW)
That's pretty cool though; I'm not a huge Poe fan, but I've read a good number of his stories. I think "The Devil in the Belfry" is my favorite because it's still surreal and dark but also funny.
Have you ever read any Herman Melville? His short stories are actually really good and wide-ranging; you might like them. Check out "Bartleby the Scrivener" and "The Bell-Tower." Moby Dick was actually amazing too. I think I've mentioned before that it was not at all what I was expecting. It was way funnier, more action-packed, and experimental than I thought it would be. Plus I just happened to check out a copy with really cool line-illustrations scattered throughout:
https://book-graphics.blogspot.com/2013 ... ed-by.html
naps wrote:I used to be a better reader before the internet.
I think we're all guilty of that (skipping to the end of articles, things like that). To be fair though, the main thing I wind up doing on the internet is reading and writing. So in the end, I think the internet has actually freed me from TV and video games more than reading.
naps wrote:muaddib wrote:I have some thoughts about Hitchens, but I'm obviously biased as a theist and I haven't read any of his books. So I probably wouldn't be giving him a fair shake.
I'm sure they're fair. He even raises my eyebrows sometimes. But it's hard to keep your wits about you when writing on such a subject. For either side.
That's the funny thing; I don't think it's anything to do with him being outspoken. If anything, his personal style and the way he presented himself is maybe the main thing I admire about him. He even dressed and smoked like Albert Camus... plus the fight he picked with the Lebanese skinheads showed he wasn't afraid to get into a good scrap:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/ ... rut-attack
I think a lot of it just had to do with how he wound up becoming an apologist for the GWB administration though. I mean, if you base your entire life around preaching Enlightenment values and individual reason as the highest good, what does it say about your faith in reason when you turn out to be spectacularly wrong when it counts? In a way, it's almost like Hitchens accidentally helped kill the faith in human reason and liberal values he believed in.
The more I think about it though, I'm pretty sure it's really nothing to do with his atheism because I realized that you could say almost all the same things about Andrew Sullivan (who's a Christian)... although I don't think he would have the guts to pick a fight in Beirut like Hitchens.