justonemoreperson wrote:There's a difference between teaching and coercion. People who genuinely want to teach are generally agnostic to the idea and teach to help people learn. Other "teachers" are those who want others to accept their point of view, so it's done for their own benefit, not for the benefit of the student.
Very few people actually want to teach.
Maybe I am wrong, but I think that there are some things that are right objectively: I mean that I am not always "agnostic to the idea". When I see someone that mistakes / misunderstands something, I am sorry for him, and sometimes for the message that he's giving to others; then I try to let him understand that he is wrong. It's never coercion, and I agree with you that if it's coercion it's done for ourselves.
But if you know and see that someone is wrong, don't you try to talk with him? (If he isn't totally crazy, sure).
I often think, feel and experience differently from you, but I appreciate our dialogue because you respond reflecting objectively. We all have our “blind corners”, but very few people listen to you, when you indicate their blind corners. It's a great quality. Mostly I stopped to show people what they do not see about themselves: it used to create a lot of problems with most people, even though I did it with a lot of tact.
I do not pretend that I haven't blind corners, or not to struggle with people showing them. But it depends on how it's done. If I trust the person, and if she isn't threatening, I don't avoid introspection.
*On a side note, my post was indirectly about some “dialogue” that I had about psychopathy last days (not on this forum). My position was “do not demonize people too much, everyone deserves a chance” and also “yes it's true, that personality has all these bad traits, but it has some qualities too”.
“Dialogue” in quotes: the first interlocutor ignored me, and the second one answered me the first time only, and didn't answer anymore when I put him on the corner with a further question. These two people are playing the teacher's role, but they avoid dialogue. I find it's coward, or hypocritical. And I wasn't challenging, I was very quiet!
I can be wrong, but if I am wrong, then explain.