mark1958 wrote:Hey MR,
You are welcome.
MotherRussia wrote:I had to think about it for awhile and I think I'm over on the counterdependent side. I'm probably more of a taker. That said I also am attracted to those counterdependent types as well, which explains the horrible relationship dynamic.
This pairing can happen. But it resembles more of a business/friendship rather then a romantic story. Since these types are more takers then givers (not meaning to hurt with those remarks), you will clash over who leads and who is "right" most of the time. This can be described, at least by outsiders as a loveless or cold pairing, but those are merely labels.
That is probably an ideal pairing for me, but most people want more closeness and intimacy. That's one of the challenges, finding someone who wants a similar level of intimacy, while also us being attracted to each other.
The major problem with this pairing is that each of you wants your partner to mirror or give attention, love, affection. But each of you actually wants to pull that from another. So he will look for that and she will too. No one is really giving. This depends on degrees of Narcissism, of course (which we all possess) and whether empathy is there or not.
I don't mind taking turns with the giving and taking, its just my natural inclination to take more. If I give and then feel unappreciated or taken advantage of, it quickly triggers anger and paranoia in me.
When I do get to the point I have feelings for someone, I do enjoy giving to an extent. But since I'm also attracted to the taking types, those types are inclined to start to take advantage or not show appreciation, etc. And then I get angry, and it becomes a cycle.
I'm beginning to ramble a bit, but what you have said has helped me process some things more so I'm just typing it out as I am.
The opposite pairing also can happened. Two co-dependent types or essentially, excessive givers. Both desperately wanting to fill a gap or void. They can smother each other. This will be a warm intimate pairing, but someone has to lead. Problems will come with this pairing over too much emotional processing, thinking and not enough rational thinking. There will be a lot of love here though.
The major problem with this group, is that they may be looking for "corrective" experiences, having self-love deficits from childhood. (counter-dependent (extreme) people have deficits too-masked with Narcissism) They need a partner who can teach/show self-reliance and a bit of more Narcissism (the healthy variety)
I did once have a partner who seemed to really look up to me, they mirrored me and I would say I led the relationship. I'm beginning to think that person may have had BPD or even DPD traits. Unfortunately they also became extra controlling and violent though. I'm willing to accept part of the responsibility since they said I never made them feel secure in the relationship. I was always looking for an excuse to leave or trying to push them away.
That has been one of my downfalls in relationships. Ambivalency, not wanting to give up my freedom, not wanting to be dependent on someone else. I'm realising that's something I have to work on. Healthy relationships require having to give up independence and allow oneself to become at least somewhat dependent on someone else. That is very scary to me for some reason.
If you understand yourself, and have the ability to empathize with others and give of yourself, without needing to take all of the time, then there is someone for you. Someone who is more dependent will give you the love you need. But you must give something back. Can you value and appreciate someone, and love them back in your own way?
This is something I'm going to work on. I'm very mistrusting of people and it gets in the way of my empathy. I automatically assume most people want to harm me so I have my guards up, always looking for things to confirm my suspicions. I realise I need to relax a bit and I need to develop my empathy towards the other person, show softness and compassion towards them and not jump to the worst conclusions. I have to let my guard down. I think its been a character weakness of mine that I haven't let myself do this. It comes from a place of fear, not wanting to be hurt, or disappointed, so always staying distant and aloof and pushing people away even when they want to get close to me.
This is just my own thinking.
I think your thinking is correct.
Your posts really helped me process a lot of things. Even if some of my personality traits and patterns are cemented, I want to at least try. The alternative is isolating myself. There's nothing to lose in trying, if I fail, I will just isolate again, and maybe try again.
mark1958 wrote:Oh, I just wanted to add this....
In my humble opinion, where you fall on this line-left or right, is where you will spend the majority of your life on. It is too ingrained.
However there are some corrections that can take place. People who fall on the dependent/other love/giving side need to learn boundaries. People on the counter-dependent/self love/taking side need to learn empathy.
Boundaries build self-esteem, which is what dependent people need more of, and empathy builds the ability to love others, which is what counter-dependent people need more of. Of course, extremes or disorders can make this quite a challenge.
I agree with this.
Thank you again for the help mark.