I long to make a corpse my beloved

manic666 wrote:Rape is to use against will, the body of the victim. A crime that repulses near everyone . To rape a person that is dead is a crime against nature not part of it. You can qoute from as many books as you like its not clever an its rather sad.To desicrate someone,s loved one , while they are dead, would render a bullet from me know ######6 problem.. THE END

EarlGreyDregs wrote:Am I the only one who read this and thought, "that's bloody romantic" ?

GinaSmith wrote:That's not very intelligent argumentation, manic666, and certainly not constructive. You haven't managed to refute my position; your only response has been to blurt out a load of subjective diatribe. Let me highlight the weakness of your arguments:

1) 'Rape is to use against will, the body of the victim'.
Just as pedophilia is not synonymous with child abuse or sex with a minor, neither is necrophilia synonymous with sexual activity with a corpse. It refers to attraction (romantic, sexual). Furthermore, you're on thin ice, as the question that raises itself here is, if a person is dead, to what extent can he/she be deemed to possess 'will'?

2) 'A crime that repulses near everyone'. The idea of sex with men repulses many heterosexual men - does that make it wrong for a woman to sleep with a man? Halitosis is repulsive to most people. Should we imprison people with bad breath? The argument from generally accepted norms would have precluded women from getting the vote and homosexuals from greater acceptance. It's naïvely conservative.

3) 'crime against nature'. What is a crime against nature? 'Crime' is legal-speak, implying human codes. Are you not anthropomorphizing nature here? Nature is surely impartial. Besides, you've completely failed to present a case for necrophilia being outside of nature.

4) 'You can qoute from as many books as you like its not clever an its rather sad'. I only quoted the dictionary to back up my point. This is a clever thing to do. Sad is a subjective word - that's your opinion, but it smacks of sour grapes as you haven't displayed the intellectual armoury required to contend my points.

5) 'To desicrate someone,s loved one , while they are dead, would render a bullet from me know ######6 problem..' Somewhere in here there's a point that could be argued for a case against sex with the dead, but it's shrouded in spelling mistakes and anger. If you want to succeed in arguments you'll have to learn how to turn down the dimmer switch on the adrenal glands and turn up the dimmer switch upstairs.

6) 'THE END' Is this the most epigrammatic coup de grâce you can muster to deliver your 'argument'? Pretty artless.

You either haven't read my points or haven't understood them. Either way, they remain uncontested.

Fengxian wrote:Rape requires a victim to be alive. A corpse isn't alive and cannot suffer from any trauma, be it psychological or physical from sexual intercourse or other.