by Tor » Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:07 am
Thanks to every one for your responses.
There's a wide range of opinion here based on everything from speculation and experience to research. The difference in experience and mental capacity, the changes a child goes through and whether the adult is sexually/emotionally oriented exclusively toward children, as well as how the families and communities react to the suggestion of children being sexually active seem to comprise the main obstacles to healthy adult/child sexuality. It would be most unfortunate for an adult to loose interest in a child simply because he/she matures, for a child to enter into a relationship with an adult under coercion or without understanding the full significance, and, especially damaging I think, is the anti-sexuality mentioned, described in the essay from the University of Minnesota. (3rd link in 1Ste's post)
As for the man's situation in the article I linked to, I agree that "where children congregate" is far too general and I'm tempted to say that despite his intentions his right to freedom of press shouldn't be denied at least in the case of vintage photographs. I believe the law sets up more specific guidelines constricting where he's allowed actually, at least I know they do for actual offenders in my own area, like no going inside schools, but I'm not sure about other restrictions.
In reading detailed accounts from adults who were sexually active as children and enjoyed the experiences they had, I can't help but wonder whether pedophilia might not be so dysfunctional if society were less prejudiced. I think that before a certain age it must really be impossible for a child to understand what sex means, and so there really can't be any compromise there, but if children, as young as 8 maybe, have been taught well ahead of time what sex is, responsibly prepared for a sexual relationship, and the children themselves (even with encouragement) choose to receive responsible, patient, loving, healthy adult partners who will stay devoted after the children are mature and who're approved by the children's parents, I can't see how any difference in age, experience, or development, or even a manageable level of disapproval from their community would keep the two from living a happy life together.
This is how I describe my own dream: A world in which marriageability is determined not by years, but by how well an individual is prepared for marriage and all it implies, not just sex. I think of a culture where parents gently encourage their children to search for a responsible life partner as young as they feel ready. I can see these sort of relationships being especially successful between extended family members like cousins or aunts and nephews, uncles and nieces since these adults would already be very close to the child's family and could live close, even in the same home with the child's parents for a time. An adult spouse would replace their young partner's parents gradually if not immediately, teaching the child, asserting positive values when the child misbehaves, while also being willing to learn from and compromise with the child. They must certainly never use the child selfishly or abuse the power they have. In many ways it would be more difficult to have an adult/child marriage than one of equal-age, but it would have its recompenses. I think the parents would necessarily be a very important part of such a relationship, counseling whenever it's helpful or necessary, but not interfering with their child's relationship and being careful not to compete with their child's spouse for affection.
How much of what I describe is just flat out impossible, I don't know. I don't wish to delude myself. I know that our cultures will likely never resemble what I've described, but I don't think I'll ever stop hoping. If society weren't so messed up I think I'd have no qualms with allowing my own children to marry extremely young, assuming I felt sure my child is secure in his/her sexuality and knows what he/she is committing to, (and what commitment is).