YouthRightsRadical wrote:Why wouldn't you be? Little girls are hot.
I saw your response several hours ago and contemplated on if, how, or whether to respond.
The statement "Little girls are hot" is purely subjective. What and who one finds "hot" is purely a matter of personal bias and perception. It is not a factual statement. It is a factual statement to say, "I think little girls are hot". But it is not a factual statement to say "Little girls are hot".
With this being the case, to state, "women are hot", "men are hot", "little girls are hot", "little boys are hot", "Hispanics are hot", etc. etc. etc. is purely opinion and do not serve to answer the question at hand: the question being,
"Why do I like .... Little girls, women, men, little boys, hispanics, Golden Retrievers ____________ "I empathize with the asker, as I myself can not find one ... not one rational reason why. Little girls can not meet the sexual, emotional and psychological needs of a man. They have no sexual drive. They can not relate to adult problems. They can not support, they can not comfort, they can not advise. They can go through the motions, but they certainly can not perform sexually or share sexual arousal/gratification with an adult. All they can do is be children. All of the explanations offered by "professionals' sound more to me like speculation and tarrot card readings than they do explanations.
It makes no sense. No sense whatsoever.