Big Cat wrote:
My mother, my sister and all my friends know it.
I have never done any official announcement to anyone, and I don't see why someone's sexual orientation should be a state affair.
When I see a beatiful child I freely say that he/she is attractive. At the beginning my friends used to think it was a joke, but now many of them are realizing that it isn't, I think
That's really amazing. It's great that your friends and family are so accepting.
Well, in reality for the family side the expression "so accepting" is not exactly true.
It is more correct to say that they tolerate me although I am a pedophile.
My mother has never beaten his prejudice towards pedophilia and she thinks it is a psychological disease.
When it comes to my friends, it is correct to say that for them it doesn't matter. For them it is something to laugh about.
Note, by the way, that my mother is 100% aware of the fact that I'm a pedophile, while my friends are probably only partially aware. One side of their brain probably says "it is a joke", and the other side say "it is true".
I would like to know what would it be their reaction once they are 100% aware that I am a pedophile.
Why do you think they're starting to realize it's not a joke?
1) It is obvious that I don't look at women.
If I didn't speak about children, they would probably think I am gay.
2) Because if it was a joke, it would be strange that I do the same joke with all group of friends
3) Sometimes I feel they are aware that I really like children. For example, when my friend showed me the picture of his little student, we were not laughing.
What kind of jokes? Something like y'all see a kid and your friend says, "Bet you'd like to take that one home, huh?"
Or something along those lines?
One of the most funny I remember....
It was at school (I was 20 years old) and at school I used to be not the most disciplinate guy.
A teacher, during a lesson, said "you are a child".
So a schoolmate said: "No... don't say this...

"
And an other schoolmate: "He will now try to have sex with himself!"
(

in that school there was a teacher (a woman) who also joked about my attraction to children. Some years ago I went to restaurant with my family and there was my sister with her son. I met the teacher at the restaurant, and she said "I hope he is not your son")
The definition of gay doesn't mention age, so technically I am gay.
It neither mentions if the males you like are conventional males or transgenders.
But many persons consider attraction to transgenders as a separate orientation.
In the same way, I consider pedophilia as a separate, stand-alone orientation.
In the thread "Is pedophilia a sexual orientation" I explain why, according to me, pedophilia can't be considered a subset of homosexuality and heterosexuality, but an orientation in itself.
Before the development of secondary sex carachteristic (which occurs during puberty) many physical features of the individuals are not related to the sex/gender, but to the age (or, better said, stage of development).
This is true for humans and this is true for many human species. Duck are a very good example: you can recognize the sex of a duck according to the color of it's plumage.
But before they are adults, when they are still infants, the color of the plumage is not feminine, neither masculine: it is a third color, and it's the same for males and females.
The color of the plumage of infants is what I call "infantile carachteristic", and pedophilia can be seen as an attraction towards infantile carachteristic.
Pedophilia is therefore not a subset of homosexuality and heterosexuality, but an orientation in itself.
I think it is more correct to see heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles as subsets of pedosexual orientation.
Really, I figure a half-truth is better than none at all.
BTW... what I was trying to say is that if you say you are gay, people think you are homosexual teleiophile, which is a lie. You don't like adult males.
I'll show you an example to understand.
Think about a male who is gay (homosexual teleiophile) and wants to come out with friends and family, but he doesn't feel ready.
So he thinks "I can start with a half-truth", and so he says to his friends and family: "I am a teleiophile".
Did he said a half-truth? Yes, but what is the point? Did he explain his sexuality? And would it be a coming out for a heterosexual pedophile to say "I am heterosexual"?
I know I am a little polemical and philosophical, but it is the way I am... in forums.
How'd you start? Comment every now and then, then gradually progress from there? Do you keep your comments PG? Such as, "Wow, he's cute!" or is it more like "Mmmm, I'd like to ride his po-go stick!"
My situation might be different, because I am young and my friends are young too: they are not married and they don't have children, and so they are not emotionally involved.
Furthermore, for the fact they are young, they don't have a rigid mentality full of prejudices as many grown adults.
By the way, to my experience, if you tell to a young adult male that a little girl is attractive, his reaction will probably similar to this sequence:
1)
2) "You are a pedophile!"
I think it is better to start like this, instead of using labels ("I am a pedophile") or doing an official coming out.
Once you will have expressed your attraction to a little girls in more occasions and with different persons, they will probably start to joke about it.
They will probably indicate you a little girl ("one girl for you!") when they see one, and it is possible they will indicate little boys too (for teleiophiles doesn't make difference, if you are a pedophile you like children).
Don't deny their statements and say "thanks" when they suggest a child to you.
With the time they will be ready for a serious coming out... and you can say that you prefer boys. It will be not a shock for them, because at that time they will have considered the fact that in the joke can be a half-truth.
So to conclude: to be honest, if you want to start with a lie, I would say that I like young girls, and not with the statement "I am gay" (attracted to adult males), because heterosexual teleiophiles can better understand attraction to young girls than attraction to adult males (the result of phallometric studies show that, although heterosexual teleiophiles have little attraction to prepubescent girls, is still greater than attraction to adult males... and infact the morpholigical distance women-girls is smaller than morpholical distance women-men).
In a second moment you can introduce your attraction to prepubescent boys.
The morpholigal distance between women and men is the greatest one (greater not only than women-girls, but than women-boys too), and to tell them the lie "I like adult males" is the worst thing according to me.
P.S.: what I wrote here is my experience with different groups of friends... the reaction of young adult males usually follows this schema, but I don't know with a 50 years old male).