you dont work on something for 10 years with that many people and accidentally name something an orientation, it just doesn't happen, these things are checked and rechecked something like that would have never gotten through to print unless it was intentional.
http://www.health.harvard.edu/newslette ... pedophilia
the funny thing is i found this article while reading another article that was bashing the APA for the "mistake" lmfao in fact the guy who posted it was saying that the pedophile were the ones pressuring the APA to call it an orientation lol i think we all know that no amount of "pressure" from any pedophile organization could ever influence the APA to make that decision, hell i bet they were like
scientist No 1: oh f**k man, i think it's an orientation
scientist No 2: no f**king way :O
scientist No 1:the criteria and data is leaning towards it, no bs man, what are we gonna do?
scientist No 2: you know if we make this public were gonna get shot right
scientist No 1: yep, looks like were gonna get shot

scientist No 2:f**k that imma just sneak it in lol YOLO
lol ok maybe it's not verbatim, but thats exactly how it would go conversation would go if i was doing the research and found it out lol