Then there's the fact that most 'scientific' studies on necrophilia use convicted criminals as their case subjects. That really winds me up.
Exactly, and my dad looked up those studies as "factual" support for the things he said to me.
Usually the people writing those studies don't actually care about the people and the groups of people they're studying and profiling. They don't want to understand.
The other way it hurts me in particular is that most of their subjects are men which is kind of hurtful to me as a woman because it gives people the impression that necrophilia is an "unfeminine" thing and that men have some monopoly on it.
Not so long ago, I had an idea of writing a factual book on the subject under a pseudonym, simply to put some accurate information out there for anyone who is interested in understanding necrophilia.
You really should. That'd be awesome. I've read a lot on the subject (using my campus's library to its full potential...if my parents saw me now...haha), obviously in an attempt to understand myself better, and while some of it is okay, a lot of it is very prejudiced and relies on stereotypes, and none of the writers are actually necrophiles so of course they rely on inaccurate but popular studies.
For most of us, it's very hurtful to be likened to somebody like that.
And I'm so sick of hearing about him all the time

No one uses john wayne gacy to attack gay people, and no one uses ted bundy to attack straight people.
For some reason people have this fascination with psychopaths....