Pedophilic fantasies?

Im a 17 year old guy and Ive had a foot fetish for many years now and I fantasize about it on a daily basis. However half a year ago I got POCD and got obsessed with pedophilia. So it was inevitable that one day my mind would sometimes link my foot fetish with pedophilia and think up of acting out the fetish on a kid to check if Im aroused by the thought of doing so. And the disturbing thing is, 50% of the time I AM aroused by such thoughts while the other 50% of the time I am not.

Furthermore I am sometimes aroused by the thought of having sex with them

Strange thing is I dont know if im a pedophile since most of the time whenever I see a kid I feel no (or very little) attractions toward them, or feel a desire to do sexual things to them.

Furthermore I am also turned on by thoguths of having sex with males and even animals bit I dont think Im gay since like as it is with children, i dont feel any noticeable attraction or sexual desire toward them
Ive also watched men do sexual acts and Ive mastuebated to them but at the same time I dont find myself feel atteaction toward guys in general....its so confusing.

Maybe Im bisexual, zoophile and pedophile all in one?

I don't know what your sexuality is for sure but I can tell that you have OCD traits. It has become apparent in several of your posts here.

I have some questions for you that I think might help gauge your level of attraction to kids. These questions are coming from my own experience as a pedophile. I also have OCD so I have some idea about how it affects sexuality.

1. Have you ever obsessed over a particular child, like she was all you could think about for a long time?

2. Do you have many memories of looking at young children in a sexual manner before the onset of your obsession? Think hard about this. Just one or two are not necessarily indicative.

3. Do you ever get full-on erections just from looking at little girls (without thinking about the sexual activities you would do with them.)

4. Is it their feet that mostly arouses you? What does the rest of them do for you?

5. Have you ever fallen in love with a child while you yourself were not a child?

6. Do you notice children much when you're not in an obsessive mood? What I mean is do you casually check out children without giving it much thought or do you first think about it, get curious, and then check them out in a sexual manner?

7. What ages turn you on?

[quote="sprooglestrewft"]I don't know what your sexuality is for sure but I can tell that you have OCD traits. It has become apparent in several of your posts here.

I have some questions for you that I think might help gauge your level of attraction to kids. These questions are coming from my own experience as a pedophile. I also have OCD so I have some idea about how it affects sexuality.

1. Have you ever obsessed over a particular child, like she was all you could think about for a long time?

Yes it has happened once, ill go into detail in the following questions regarding this (happened only with 1 girl who was 8 but while she looked young obviously she also looked very mature....she looked serious)

2. Do you have many memories of looking at young children in a sexual manner before the onset of your obsession? Think hard about this. Just one or two are not necessarily indicative.

Ive thought a long time about this over several months, I dont recall feeling desires for kids or even thinking about them back in middle school....I was a loner in middle school and I was antisocial so I have lots of memories from that period of time. However I was strongly attracted to this tall asian girl in my grade with long legs/supple rear, but no I dont remember feeling any aignificant attraction to Fkids
before I was in 10th grade, when I started obsessing over pedophilia.

3. Do you ever get full-on erections just from looking at little girls (without thinking about the sexual activities you would do with them.)

It has happened only once with the 8 year old girl I mentioned (I found her on google images). The disturbing thing qas that on her photo (it was posted on a blog) there were comments (posted by men) about desiring to have sexual activities with her.
4. Is it their feet that mostly arouses you? What does the rest of them do for you?

No not all of the time....I like long, somewhat slender, clean looking feat so sometimes it is their feat that arouse me at times. Also i visited a message board that had pedophiles arguing and fighting with non pedos and one guy posted a pic of a girl who had long bare legs, so at times if a prebuescent girl has long slender legs it can be arousing. Also on 4chan I saw a pic of a girl sitting with her legs wide open and that was arousing as well. But all these things in my experience are more arousing with girls my age and older (ages 15 - 30).

5. Have you ever fallen in love with a child while you yourself were not a child?

I dont have any memories of doing so if i ever did.

6. Do you notice children much when you're not in an obsessive mood? What I mean is do you casually check out children without giving it much thought or do you first think about it, get curious, and then check them out in a sexual manner?

I dobt notice kids at all when im not in such a mood. Like at one time I saw 2 prepubescent girls playing together in bikinis (it waa a modeling picture apparently) and I felt no reaction. And for the 2nd part of this question I do both...but when I get curious I uaually look at them to see if they turn me on at all. I also find myself (sonetimes) looking at their feet and legs without my conscious knowledge, which is pretty weird.

7. What ages turn you on?[/quote/]
Im turned on by people anywhere from 8 - 40 years old, almost strictly female, rarely male. That being said my primary attraction range is 13 - 18. Before this whole pedophilia obsession crap I never fantasized about kids, and its just frustrating

Bumpity bump. And spoogle, thanks a lot for the questions, they seem very indicative of gauging one's "child attraction" meter.

Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

I see...
So in your opinion would you say im a pedophile, somebody with a pedophilic side or this sort of sexual response at young girls' legs/feet is normal?

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

Sproogle, I've been arguing similar for years. But never managed to say it so clearly. It is for that reason I find it almost impossible to believe that regular men don't find at least some parts of pre-pubescent girls to be eye-candy. Since people are so in denial about so many things, it can be very hard to get to the truth. We need studies done!

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

By the way in terms of sexual response, i respond far more sexually to the legs/feet of young women and teens, than I do to the legs/feet of younger girls. But yes even though the attraction is not as strong/mild, it still exists.... .

-- Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:37 am --

UnluckyPaladin wrote:

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

Sproogle, I've been arguing similar for years. But never managed to say it so clearly. It is for that reason I find it almost impossible to believe that regular men don't find at least some parts of pre-pubescent girls to be eye-candy. Since people are so in denial about so many things, it can be very hard to get to the truth. We need studies done!

Unluckypaladin what if there was a new philia called "adultophilia" where its a philia to be attracted to women 10 years younger than you? Imagine all the new guests and accounts in the Paraphilia section if that ever happened! XD

fluurtz123 wrote:

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

By the way in terms of sexual response, i respond far more sexually to the legs/feet of young women and teens, than I do to the legs/feet of younger girls. But yes even though the attraction is not as strong/mild, it still exists.... .

-- Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:37 am --

UnluckyPaladin wrote:

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

Sproogle, I've been arguing similar for years. But never managed to say it so clearly. It is for that reason I find it almost impossible to believe that regular men don't find at least some parts of pre-pubescent girls to be eye-candy. Since people are so in denial about so many things, it can be very hard to get to the truth. We need studies done!

Unluckypaladin what if there was a new philia called "adultophilia" where its a philia to be attracted to women 10 years younger than you? Imagine all the new guests and accounts in the Paraphilia section if that ever happened! XD

Yep. It sure is a large part of human behavior that is considered to be some type of psychiatric condition or other.

-- Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:47 am --

fluurtz123 wrote:

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

By the way in terms of sexual response, i respond far more sexually to the legs/feet of young women and teens, than I do to the legs/feet of younger girls. But yes even though the attraction is not as strong/mild, it still exists.... .

-- Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:37 am --

UnluckyPaladin wrote:

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

Sproogle, I've been arguing similar for years. But never managed to say it so clearly. It is for that reason I find it almost impossible to believe that regular men don't find at least some parts of pre-pubescent girls to be eye-candy. Since people are so in denial about so many things, it can be very hard to get to the truth. We need studies done!

Unluckypaladin what if there was a new philia called "adultophilia" where its a philia to be attracted to women 10 years younger than you? Imagine all the new guests and accounts in the Paraphilia section if that ever happened! XD

I feel the same. Much less sexual attraction to little girls than women and teens. Yet visually, I think they look really a lot like very small women. How can you be male and not enjoy the look of them? It's something I will never understand.

-- Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:47 am --

fluurtz123 wrote:

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

By the way in terms of sexual response, i respond far more sexually to the legs/feet of young women and teens, than I do to the legs/feet of younger girls. But yes even though the attraction is not as strong/mild, it still exists.... .

-- Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:37 am --

UnluckyPaladin wrote:

sprooglestrewft wrote:Glad I could help. To be honest this sexual response to prepubescent girls' bare legs and feet doesn't seem all that bizarre to me even though I'm sure most "normal" people would strongly disagree.

Aside from the size of the legs and feet, there is no major change in the shape of these body parts between the ages of 6 and 20. Their just a bit smoother and silkier when they're fresh. I should know because I've spent a lot of time looking at photos of girls' bare legs.

Sproogle, I've been arguing similar for years. But never managed to say it so clearly. It is for that reason I find it almost impossible to believe that regular men don't find at least some parts of pre-pubescent girls to be eye-candy. Since people are so in denial about so many things, it can be very hard to get to the truth. We need studies done!

Unluckypaladin what if there was a new philia called "adultophilia" where its a philia to be attracted to women 10 years younger than you? Imagine all the new guests and accounts in the Paraphilia section if that ever happened! XD

I feel the same. Much less sexual attraction to little girls than women and teens. Yet visually, I think they look really a lot like very small women. How can you be male and not enjoy the look of them? It's something I will never understand.

Attraction to adults is called teleiophilia.