A new task for me:actually learn about reasoning and logic^1.
To me logic is mainly a tool in my thinking that I should treat like a language more than some seperate entity of a subject like how a lot of intellects use and advocate it to the point that emotional factors or metaphysical factors (like religion and the supernatural) should be utterly disregarded^1 .
I was actually surprised that wiki had a whole page on the history of logic.I was also surprised by something that might shake up things when ppl say "that the logic I'm using is objective" unlike how when you talk about say philosophy ppl tell you "Oh what your saying is too caught up in a Eurocentric mindframe"...



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_logic
for one thing that goes as far back as the 6th century BC with a dude named Pāṇini having invented a kind of logic with similarities to Boolean logic which would pop up centuries later,but he applied it to Sanskrit grammar.
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_logic ^7
and according to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic page
Logic was studied in several ancient civilizations, including India,[4] China,[5] Persia and Greece.
the logic in Persia I wouldn't be to surprised if it came to influence ancient Persian thought of the pre-Islamic variety,Zorastrianism,Islamic thought particulary the Shia denomination in Iran and the rest of central Asian and that's NOT EVEN consider the interconnections that came by the roundabout from Indian and ancient Greeks going about whether for travel or during conflicts like the Alexandrian conquests

To me this is significant b/c it really makes me think that I've got to re-evulaute how the epistemology of Dharmmic and Daoic religions works.The Abrahamic religions are famous for being big on epistemology ^3 based on faith and reason (to varying extents among sects though `~`,obviously) but so often when ppl think of Dharmmic and Daoic religions aside from a the lack of centralization and relative humanism next to the Abrahamic religions,the epistemology in those religions are big on emotions,phenemonology,perception and experience ^4 but knowing this;that the cultures that they arose from DO have their own traditions of logic show not only that the epistemology of Eastern philosophy is always borderline psychological or metaphysical but they may very HAVE have logic structures implemented and melded in.
And obviously that the mentality/worldview from South Asian and Sinospheric societies^6 have aside from not only have different emotional stances of value judgements have different traditions of logic that may very well have melded into the society for centuries NOT UNLIKE how in the "West" the logic were used to is Aristotelian ^5 in origins.
This in turn adds a new dimension in "East and West" differences discussions in such a critical way

This is SO IMPORTANT when you try to think of how ppl in such culturally different societies arrive at claimed affirmations and truth values

As far as it goes for me,logic would help me with my writing (like this stuff) esp.since like (what ~2/3 of the times


Could you imagine if I had tried when I was little xD ?.It would've screwed around with my inner wiring in ways that would make what I do and thought convoluted but in a even more different way


If I can do an analogue to physicality it'll be like the more emotional sort of philosophy and stuff about morality and ethics is strength and cardio training ^8 and logic and reasoning will be more like aerobic and reflex stuff like learning the reflexes,footwork,stances and techniques for a sport or dancing.Or maybe I'll say what I said that previous sentence around after I go thru my exploration

(Sedgeway for another chat on the exercise book I've been following set up


^1 Like some philosophers have been.In recent history I could cite logical positivism,structuralism and maybe even shoehorn something about Bertrand Russell who I don't really know enough about to say about.
^2 Or Eastern philosophy if you really wanna say that so often misunderstood and "under-defined" umberella phrase -~-
^3 The branch of philosophy that can be thought of as "the theory of knowledge" including it's methods,limits,validity (this INCLUDES how to tell apart belief from fact)
^4 Think about words like Karma,Mantra,Dao/"the way",Nirvana,Chakra,Zen and how they're thrown around
^5 there were pre-Aristotelian Greek philosophers who were big into looking at logic.For example Pythagoras for obvious reasons (he needed it to make his math stuff) but Aristotle was the one who formulated it (logic) down in the way we know it
^6 I'd be interested to know and discover how they mingle in Southeastern Asian societies where they've historically interacted with India and China like Vietnam,Cambodia,Thailand, Malaysia,Indonesia etc.Those latter two have notable Muslim minorities by the way

^7 Very interesting first paragraph
Logic in China plays a particularly interesting role in the history of logic due to its repression and abandonment compared to the strong ancient adoption and continued development of the study of logic in Europe, India, and the Islamic world.
it says it first grew of Mozi's (contemoprary of Confucius) Mohism and logician were said to be from the "School of Names" or"School of Forms and Names".
I've already heard of Mohism and am interested in it for it's optimistic take on how ppl are inherently good.
^8 For me at least
