fiveintime wrote:I doubt it's narcissistic. You probably should take into account who you're talking to though. If a rape victim says you offended them, go ahead and feel guilt. It's probably the right thing to do. If somebody arguing for psychopathy says you offended them, don't worry about it. They're either joking, or they'll get over it.
Yes – I mean Narcissistic in the sense that you are so acutely aware of how your behaviour or words affect others that you almost imbue them with more influence or significance than they actually have. In truth, half the time, people don’t even remember what you’ve said, and couldn’t care less! Meanwhile, you are hauling yourself over the coals, trying to decipher how you’ve upset someone. It’s a bit self-important really isn’t it?
fiveintime wrote:That does make sense, but very few psychopaths seek treatment voluntarily. They're usually court mandated to therapy, pushed into therapy by family, or go voluntarily for separate reasons. I went voluntarily, for separate reasons. I recognised my behaviour would cause problems. My personality enabled the behaviour, but I'm still not convinced there's anything wrong with my personality itself.
Do you think that there is this level of self-awareness in most psychopaths FIT? Is there a sense of knowing something ‘is not right’ but not really knowing what it is? Does this sense become most pronounced when the world tells you (in subtle or more explicit terms) that you are ‘not normal’? If so what is the outcome of this – for you?
In my relationship, my partner expressed many times that he was not as others were. But his attitude veered from wanting to change and have a ‘normal’ life, to a sentiment very similar to your bar-room analogy: - i.e. he had ‘seen the light’ about the world and everyone else was a fool for believing otherwise.
Thus, he oscillated between trying to be the kind of person that the world respected or, in his words ‘took seriously’ and being congruent with who he knew himself to be. It was a juggling act and quite often he tired of it, claiming that being involved with people was too ‘messy’ and too difficult. When he did show his true character, people ran for the hills (I admit, when I saw some aspects of his personality being revealed I was one of those runners). This, I believe, only forced him back into a position where he had to become MORE congruent with who he knew himself to be, to behave even more in keeping with his character; to shock, to hurt others. And therefore to be even more rejected by the very people who had claimed to love him which was grist to the mill.
It is a vicious cycle isn’t it? Each time the individual is told that the way he knows himself to be is unacceptable, the deeper his commitment to that difference becomes. Because what else is left?