Esmoke wrote:I’ve read this dynamic and I’m trying to completely understand it. Do you think the person with the PD is aware of this dynamic, do they actually see the other person as an extension of themselves and idealized parts of themselves or is it more of an unconscious thing similar to projecting where you may hate another person for showing the same traits that you actually hate in yourself but are unaware that is why you don’t like them?
That has a lot of layers so I can just randomly grab stuff and hope it sheds light somehow.
First of all, the mechanism of projection actually - from a psychodynamic POV - is directly connected with this sort of perception. The idea is that there is a hierarchy of defense mechanisms, some of which are very primitive and are used very early on by infants already, others are used much later and require certain more complex internal mechanics / neurological networks if you so want, to even be used. Projection and especially projective identification are part of those early ones. This also means that the barrier between subject and object is not clearly defined, the ability to distinguish between a clear, three-dimensional "me" and "other" arent there. So when certain regressive phenomena occur or certain areas of the mind need to work on stuff that didnt have the opportunity to develop, projective [or interpersonal] defenses will be used, as a means to compensate for the inability to tolerate certain things, or to defend against them with purely "intrapsychic" means, thereby underlining the [unconscious] delusion that the otheris part of me, or has parts of me, or is in me, or i am on him, or he is on me etc... there can be lots of variants. All of that will have effects in my interactions in some way of course, but most of them might be hard to see. And the defense itself, yes, that will - not always but most of the time - remain unseen.
On the topic of fragments, what I've seen a lot and which I start to see in myself here and there is that reality of certain - I would say missing psychological parts - which make it hard to understand certain concepts. I remember I've told many borderline/narcissist people on here in the past about their "relationships", that they werent
actual relationships for example. Those people were basiaclly only fighting, then getting together again idealizing each other, then breaking up... on a weekly basis. So I told them that what they had was actually not a relationship at all, did not hold love or intimacy at all, but a personality crisis and an addiction to
intensity... and I explained why. Naturally this never brought that reality into their awareness. Or there is a lot of people who should be working on themselves, who could develop into something different, but when you look closely it seems not only dont they have the motivation, ot the strength, or even on a lower level the ability to "keep with the thing", but even deeper they lack the ability to
comprehend "progress" or "development", for them its not a thing at all. If you ask them about it they will tell you they do of course and they will be convinced about it. But in the same way like a bordeliner will fail to give a detailed [normal-level] description of their loved ones for example, while being completely obliviosu to the fact that they dont have a intimate relationship with that [whole] person - if you ask a bit, you quickly see that there is lots of holes there and there is no real understanding at all. Even writing this it might be that some readers will fail tos ee how this even connects to fragmentation or projective or splitting processes, so even from the outside it can be quite hard.
The ability to perceive those things in oneself depends in turn on something for which I think theres only a German word, namely "therapeutische Ich-Spaltung", so that ability to look at yourself as an observer with a certain curiosity, which in turn is a foundation for therapy. But that ability again of course can become hampered if your ego becomes split, or if you are shifting into states that make access to certain areas impossible. There can be obvious occurances of such shifts of course where you see yourself for periods being in a totally different internal conainer, where everything is suddenly dark and meaningless... or you sit in therapy and there is not a single thought in your mind for a long time. So you can perceiv that, but you cant perceive what it means or what causes it.
Lastly more specifically on the topic of pathological narcissism, I think its interesting to look at the DSM criteria for "interpersonal exploitativeness". If you read what the DSM says about it, it becomes much clearer what they mean is totalyl different from the conning and manipulation of the ASPD diagnosis. They describe it more as a sideeffect of grandiosity and entitlement, so you will use other people because you expect them to be parts of your reality, you expect them to make way for you, to behave like you want, the king arrives and everyboy
naturally bows clears a path. So in some way such people will of course be aware that the other people are in a way extensions of their inner world, they must be aware of that, else there would be a field of darkness extending around then that might be much more dangerous than the extension of grandiosity. But at the same time they are not aware of it, because its so normal and theres no abiliyt to imagine it differently.